{"id":85064,"date":"2025-06-01T03:02:24","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T03:02:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=85064"},"modified":"2025-06-01T03:02:24","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T03:02:24","slug":"what-is-the-ground-on-which-the-supreme-court-can-refuse-relief-under","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/what-is-the-ground-on-which-the-supreme-court-can-refuse-relief-under\/","title":{"rendered":"What is the ground on which the Supreme Court can refuse relief under"},"content":{"rendered":"

What is the ground on which the Supreme Court can refuse relief under Article 32?<\/p>\n

[amp_mcq option1=”The aggrieved person can get remedy from another court” option2=”That disputed facts have to be investigated” option3=”That no fundamental right has been infringed” option4=”That the petitioner has not asked for the proper writ applicable to his\/her case” correct=”option3″]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n
UPSC CDS-1 – 2020<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Download PDF<\/a>Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Article 32 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to move the Supreme Court for the enforcement of fundamental rights. The Supreme Court’s jurisdiction under Article 32 is specifically tied to the infringement of a fundamental right. If the Court determines that the petitioner’s fundamental right has not been violated, it can refuse to grant relief under Article 32.<\/section>\n
Article 32 is a fundamental right in itself. The Supreme Court has held that it cannot refuse to entertain a petition under Article 32 merely because an alternative remedy is available, but the primary requirement is the violation of a fundamental right.<\/section>\n
While issues like disputed facts might lead the court to direct the petitioner to a lower court or exercise caution, the fundamental ground for rejecting an Article 32 petition is the lack of violation of a fundamental right. The specific writ sought not being the ‘proper’ one might lead to the court issuing a different writ, but not necessarily refusing relief entirely if a fundamental right violation is established.<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

What is the ground on which the Supreme Court can refuse relief under Article 32? [amp_mcq option1=”The aggrieved person can get remedy from another court” option2=”That disputed facts have to be investigated” option3=”That no fundamental right has been infringed” option4=”That the petitioner has not asked for the proper writ applicable to his\/her case” correct=”option3″] This … <\/p>\n

Detailed SolutionWhat is the ground on which the Supreme Court can refuse relief under<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1087],"tags":[1288,1186,1099],"class_list":["post-85064","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-cds-1","tag-1288","tag-fundamental-rights","tag-indian-polity-and-governance","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"\nWhat is the ground on which the Supreme Court can refuse relief under<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Article 32 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to move the Supreme Court for the enforcement of fundamental rights. The Supreme Court's jurisdiction under Article 32 is specifically tied to the infringement of a fundamental right. If the Court determines that the petitioner's fundamental right has not been violated, it can refuse to grant relief under Article 32. Article 32 is a fundamental right in itself. The Supreme Court has held that it cannot refuse to entertain a petition under Article 32 merely because an alternative remedy is available, but the primary requirement is the violation of a fundamental right.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/what-is-the-ground-on-which-the-supreme-court-can-refuse-relief-under\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"What is the ground on which the Supreme Court can refuse relief under\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Article 32 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to move the Supreme Court for the enforcement of fundamental rights. The Supreme Court's jurisdiction under Article 32 is specifically tied to the infringement of a fundamental right. If the Court determines that the petitioner's fundamental right has not been violated, it can refuse to grant relief under Article 32. Article 32 is a fundamental right in itself. The Supreme Court has held that it cannot refuse to entertain a petition under Article 32 merely because an alternative remedy is available, but the primary requirement is the violation of a fundamental right.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/what-is-the-ground-on-which-the-supreme-court-can-refuse-relief-under\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T03:02:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"What is the ground on which the Supreme Court can refuse relief under","description":"Article 32 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to move the Supreme Court for the enforcement of fundamental rights. The Supreme Court's jurisdiction under Article 32 is specifically tied to the infringement of a fundamental right. If the Court determines that the petitioner's fundamental right has not been violated, it can refuse to grant relief under Article 32. Article 32 is a fundamental right in itself. The Supreme Court has held that it cannot refuse to entertain a petition under Article 32 merely because an alternative remedy is available, but the primary requirement is the violation of a fundamental right.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/what-is-the-ground-on-which-the-supreme-court-can-refuse-relief-under\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"What is the ground on which the Supreme Court can refuse relief under","og_description":"Article 32 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to move the Supreme Court for the enforcement of fundamental rights. The Supreme Court's jurisdiction under Article 32 is specifically tied to the infringement of a fundamental right. If the Court determines that the petitioner's fundamental right has not been violated, it can refuse to grant relief under Article 32. Article 32 is a fundamental right in itself. The Supreme Court has held that it cannot refuse to entertain a petition under Article 32 merely because an alternative remedy is available, but the primary requirement is the violation of a fundamental right.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/what-is-the-ground-on-which-the-supreme-court-can-refuse-relief-under\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T03:02:24+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/what-is-the-ground-on-which-the-supreme-court-can-refuse-relief-under\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/what-is-the-ground-on-which-the-supreme-court-can-refuse-relief-under\/","name":"What is the ground on which the Supreme Court can refuse relief under","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T03:02:24+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T03:02:24+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"Article 32 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to move the Supreme Court for the enforcement of fundamental rights. The Supreme Court's jurisdiction under Article 32 is specifically tied to the infringement of a fundamental right. If the Court determines that the petitioner's fundamental right has not been violated, it can refuse to grant relief under Article 32. Article 32 is a fundamental right in itself. The Supreme Court has held that it cannot refuse to entertain a petition under Article 32 merely because an alternative remedy is available, but the primary requirement is the violation of a fundamental right.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/what-is-the-ground-on-which-the-supreme-court-can-refuse-relief-under\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/what-is-the-ground-on-which-the-supreme-court-can-refuse-relief-under\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/what-is-the-ground-on-which-the-supreme-court-can-refuse-relief-under\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC CDS-1","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-cds-1\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"What is the ground on which the Supreme Court can refuse relief under"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85064","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=85064"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85064\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=85064"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=85064"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=85064"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}