[amp_mcq option1=”A directly ruled colony” option2=”A princely state with internal autonomy” option3=”A territory under Tibetan suzerainty” option4=”A fully independent kingdom” correct=”option2″]<\/p>\n
The correct answer is: b) A princely state with internal autonomy.<\/p>\n
Sikkim was a princely state in India during the British Raj. It was a semi-independent state with its own ruler, the Chogyal, who was responsible for internal affairs. However, the British had control over Sikkim’s external affairs, including its defense and foreign policy.<\/p>\n
Sikkim was never a directly ruled colony of the British. It was a treaty state, which meant that it had entered into a treaty with the British government. The treaty gave the British certain rights in Sikkim, but it also recognized the Chogyal’s authority over the state.<\/p>\n
Sikkim was not a territory under Tibetan suzerainty. Tibet was a neighboring country, but it did not have any control over Sikkim. The Chogyal was the sole ruler of Sikkim, and he was not subject to any foreign power.<\/p>\n
Sikkim was not a fully independent kingdom. It was a princely state with internal autonomy, but it was not a fully independent country. The British had control over Sikkim’s external affairs, and the Chogyal was not the sole ruler of the state.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
[amp_mcq option1=”A directly ruled colony” option2=”A princely state with internal autonomy” option3=”A territory under Tibetan suzerainty” option4=”A fully independent kingdom” correct=”option2″]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[992],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-75426","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sikkim-gk-mcq","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"\n