[amp_mcq option1=”Religious freedom vs. gender equality” option2=”State control over temples” option3=”Tourism and religious practice” option4=”Pilgrimage rights” correct=”option1″]<\/p>\n
The correct answer is: A) Religious freedom vs. gender equality.<\/p>\n
The Sabarimala temple case is a landmark case in Indian law that has brought about a debate on religious freedom vs. gender equality. The case revolves around the question of whether women of menstruating age should be allowed to enter the Sabarimala temple, a Hindu temple in Kerala, India. The temple is dedicated to the deity Ayyappan, who is believed to be a celibate god. According to Hindu tradition, women of menstruating age are considered to be impure and are therefore not allowed to enter the temple.<\/p>\n
In 2018, the Supreme Court of India ruled that the ban on women entering the Sabarimala temple was unconstitutional and that women of all ages should be allowed to enter the temple. The ruling was met with protests from Hindu groups, who argued that the ban was a matter of religious freedom. The case has since been appealed to the Supreme Court, and the final decision is still pending.<\/p>\n
The Sabarimala temple case has sparked a debate on the issue of religious freedom vs. gender equality. Some people argue that the ban on women entering the temple is a matter of religious freedom and that the government should not interfere with religious practices. Others argue that the ban is discriminatory and that women should be allowed to enter the temple on the same terms as men. The case is still ongoing, and it remains to be seen how the Supreme Court will rule.<\/p>\n
The other options are incorrect because they do not accurately reflect the main issue at stake in the Sabarimala temple case. Option B, state control over temples, is not a major issue in the case. The state government of Kerala does not have any control over the Sabarimala temple, which is managed by a trust of Hindu priests. Option C, tourism and religious practice, is also not a major issue in the case. The Sabarimala temple is a popular tourist destination, but the case is not about the impact of tourism on religious practice. Option D, pilgrimage rights, is also not a major issue in the case. The Sabarimala temple is a pilgrimage destination for Hindus, but the case is not about the rights of pilgrims to visit the temple.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
[amp_mcq option1=”Religious freedom vs. gender equality” option2=”State control over temples” option3=”Tourism and religious practice” option4=”Pilgrimage rights” correct=”option1″]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[983],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-73349","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-kerala-state-gk-mcq","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"\n