[amp_mcq option1=”Only conclusion I follows” option2=”Only conclusion II follows” option3=”Either I or II follows” option4=”Neither I nor II follows E. Both I and II follow” correct=”option1″]<\/p>\n
The correct answer is: Only conclusion I follows.<\/p>\n
The statement “The T.V. staff deserves an applaud for showing booth capture” does not necessarily mean that people involved in booth capturing have been recognised and are being tried by law. It is possible that the T.V. staff showed booth capture in order to raise awareness of the issue, or to expose the wrongdoing of those involved. It is also possible that the T.V. staff showed booth capture in order to entertain viewers, or to increase their ratings. Therefore, conclusion II does not follow.<\/p>\n
However, the statement “The T.V. staff deserves an applaud for showing booth capture” does suggest that the T.V. staff aims at showing things in their true perspective. This is because booth capture is a serious issue, and it is important to show it in order to raise awareness of the problem. Therefore, conclusion I follows.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
[amp_mcq option1=”Only conclusion I follows” option2=”Only conclusion II follows” option3=”Either I or II follows” option4=”Neither I nor II follows E. Both I and II follow” correct=”option1″]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[722],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-56486","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-statement-and-conclusion","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"\n