[amp_mcq option1=”Only conclusion I follows” option2=”Only conclusion II follows” option3=”Either I or II follows” option4=”Neither I nor II follows E. Both I and II follow” correct=”option1″]<\/p>\n
The correct answer is: Only conclusion I follows.<\/p>\n
The statement says that there is a demand for a separate rating agency for IT companies to protect investors. This does not mean that investors will be protected if a separate rating agency is established. It is possible that a separate rating agency will not be able to assess the financial worth of IT companies any better than existing rating agencies.<\/p>\n
Conclusion I follows from the statement because the statement says that assessment of financial worth of IT companies calls for a separate set of skills, insight and competencies. This means that existing rating agencies may not have the necessary skills, insight and competencies to assess the financial worth of IT companies.<\/p>\n
Conclusion II does not follow from the statement because the statement does not say anything about whether investors will be protected if a separate rating agency is established.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
[amp_mcq option1=”Only conclusion I follows” option2=”Only conclusion II follows” option3=”Either I or II follows” option4=”Neither I nor II follows E. Both I and II follow” correct=”option1″]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[722],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-54969","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-statement-and-conclusion","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"\n