{"id":51034,"date":"2024-04-15T23:18:58","date_gmt":"2024-04-15T23:18:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=51034"},"modified":"2024-04-15T23:18:58","modified_gmt":"2024-04-15T23:18:58","slug":"directions-in-each-of-the-following-questions-a-statement-is-given-followed-by-three-conclusions-give-answer-statement-a-state-government-suspended-two-additional-district-judges-assumptions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/directions-in-each-of-the-following-questions-a-statement-is-given-followed-by-three-conclusions-give-answer-statement-a-state-government-suspended-two-additional-district-judges-assumptions\/","title":{"rendered":"Directions : In each of the following questions a statement is given, followed by three conclusions. Give answer : Statement : A State Government suspended two additional district judges. Assumptions : I. They were negligent in discharging duties. II. There was a charge of misconduct against them. III. The government officials were biased against them."},"content":{"rendered":"

[amp_mcq option1=”None is implicit” option2=”Either I or II is implicit” option3=”Any one of the three is implicit” option4=”Only I and III are implicit E. Either I or III is implicit” correct=”option2″]<\/p>\n

The correct answer is B. Either I or II is implicit.<\/p>\n

The statement does not provide enough information to determine whether the judges were negligent in discharging their duties or whether there was a charge of misconduct against them. However, it is possible that either of these things could have led to their suspension. The statement also does not provide any information about the government officials, so it is impossible to say whether they were biased against the judges.<\/p>\n

Therefore, the only assumptions that can be made based on the statement are that either the judges were negligent in discharging their duties or that there was a charge of misconduct against them.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[amp_mcq option1=”None is implicit” option2=”Either I or II is implicit” option3=”Any one of the three is implicit” option4=”Only I and III are implicit E. Either I or III is implicit” correct=”option2″]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[721],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-51034","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-statement-and-assumption","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"\nDirections : In each of the following questions a statement is given, followed by three conclusions. Give answer : Statement : A State Government suspended two additional district judges. Assumptions : I. They were negligent in discharging duties. II. There was a charge of misconduct against them. III. The government officials were biased against them.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/directions-in-each-of-the-following-questions-a-statement-is-given-followed-by-three-conclusions-give-answer-statement-a-state-government-suspended-two-additional-district-judges-assumptions\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Directions : In each of the following questions a statement is given, followed by three conclusions. Give answer : Statement : A State Government suspended two additional district judges. Assumptions : I. They were negligent in discharging duties. II. There was a charge of misconduct against them. III. The government officials were biased against them.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"[amp_mcq option1=”None is implicit” option2=”Either I or II is implicit” option3=”Any one of the three is implicit” option4=”Only I and III are implicit E. Either I or III is implicit” correct=”option2″]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/directions-in-each-of-the-following-questions-a-statement-is-given-followed-by-three-conclusions-give-answer-statement-a-state-government-suspended-two-additional-district-judges-assumptions\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-04-15T23:18:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Directions : In each of the following questions a statement is given, followed by three conclusions. Give answer : Statement : A State Government suspended two additional district judges. Assumptions : I. They were negligent in discharging duties. II. There was a charge of misconduct against them. III. The government officials were biased against them.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/directions-in-each-of-the-following-questions-a-statement-is-given-followed-by-three-conclusions-give-answer-statement-a-state-government-suspended-two-additional-district-judges-assumptions\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Directions : In each of the following questions a statement is given, followed by three conclusions. Give answer : Statement : A State Government suspended two additional district judges. Assumptions : I. They were negligent in discharging duties. II. There was a charge of misconduct against them. III. The government officials were biased against them.","og_description":"[amp_mcq option1=”None is implicit” option2=”Either I or II is implicit” option3=”Any one of the three is implicit” option4=”Only I and III are implicit E. Either I or III is implicit” correct=”option2″]","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/directions-in-each-of-the-following-questions-a-statement-is-given-followed-by-three-conclusions-give-answer-statement-a-state-government-suspended-two-additional-district-judges-assumptions\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2024-04-15T23:18:58+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/directions-in-each-of-the-following-questions-a-statement-is-given-followed-by-three-conclusions-give-answer-statement-a-state-government-suspended-two-additional-district-judges-assumptions\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/directions-in-each-of-the-following-questions-a-statement-is-given-followed-by-three-conclusions-give-answer-statement-a-state-government-suspended-two-additional-district-judges-assumptions\/","name":"Directions : In each of the following questions a statement is given, followed by three conclusions. Give answer : Statement : A State Government suspended two additional district judges. Assumptions : I. They were negligent in discharging duties. II. There was a charge of misconduct against them. III. The government officials were biased against them.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-04-15T23:18:58+00:00","dateModified":"2024-04-15T23:18:58+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/directions-in-each-of-the-following-questions-a-statement-is-given-followed-by-three-conclusions-give-answer-statement-a-state-government-suspended-two-additional-district-judges-assumptions\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/directions-in-each-of-the-following-questions-a-statement-is-given-followed-by-three-conclusions-give-answer-statement-a-state-government-suspended-two-additional-district-judges-assumptions\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/directions-in-each-of-the-following-questions-a-statement-is-given-followed-by-three-conclusions-give-answer-statement-a-state-government-suspended-two-additional-district-judges-assumptions\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"mcq","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Competitive reasoning","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/mcq\/competitive-reasoning\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"Statement and assumption","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/mcq\/competitive-reasoning\/statement-and-assumption\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":5,"name":"Directions : In each of the following questions a statement is given, followed by three conclusions. Give answer : Statement : A State Government suspended two additional district judges. Assumptions : I. They were negligent in discharging duties. II. There was a charge of misconduct against them. III. The government officials were biased against them."}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51034","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=51034"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51034\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=51034"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=51034"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=51034"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}