[amp_mcq option1=”Only I follows” option2=”Only II follows” option3=”Either I or II follows” option4=”Neither I nor II follows E. Both I and II follow” correct=”option3″]<\/p>\n
The correct answer is: C. Either I or II follows<\/strong><\/p>\n The statement says that India has been continuously experiencing military threats from its neighboring countries. This does not mean that India is in a state of war with its neighbors. It is possible that the threats are not serious enough to warrant an all-out war. In such a case, it would be better for India to engage in a serious dialogue with its neighbors to reduce the tension at its borders. However, if the threats are serious and India feels that its security is at risk, then it may have no choice but to engage in an all-out war.<\/p>\n Option I is a strong course of action that could lead to a lot of bloodshed and destruction. Option II is a more peaceful course of action that could help to resolve the conflict without violence. It is up to the Indian government to decide which course of action is best in the given situation.<\/p>\n Option A is incorrect because it only considers Option I. Option B is incorrect because it only considers Option II. Option D is incorrect because both Option I and Option II are possible courses of action. Option E is incorrect because it is not always the case that both Option I and Option II follow.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" [amp_mcq option1=”Only I follows” option2=”Only II follows” option3=”Either I or II follows” option4=”Neither I nor II follows E. Both I and II follow” correct=”option3″]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[724],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-49066","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-course-of-action","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"\n