[amp_mcq option1=”Only I follows” option2=”Only II follows” option3=”Either I or II follows” option4=”Neither I nor II follows E. Both I and II follow” correct=”option3″]<\/p>\n
The correct answer is: C. Either I or II follows<\/strong><\/p>\n The statement does not provide enough information to determine whether or not India should stop sending players to the future Olympic Games. It is possible that India’s poor performance was due to factors beyond the control of the players or the government, such as bad luck or injuries. In this case, it would not be appropriate to stop sending players to the Olympics. However, it is also possible that India’s poor performance was due to poor planning or execution on the part of the government or the players. In this case, it would be appropriate to set up an enquiry commission to find out the reason for the poor performance and to make recommendations for improvement.<\/p>\n Therefore, either course of action I or course of action II could be appropriate, depending on the specific circumstances.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" [amp_mcq option1=”Only I follows” option2=”Only II follows” option3=”Either I or II follows” option4=”Neither I nor II follows E. Both I and II follow” correct=”option3″]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[724],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-47301","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-course-of-action","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"\n