[amp_mcq option1=”Only conclusion I follows” option2=”Only conclusion II follows” option3=”Either I or II follows” option4=”Neither I nor II follows E. Both I and II follow” correct=”option1″]<\/p>\n
The correct answer is: Only conclusion I follows.<\/p>\n
The first statement is “Many scooters are trucks.” This means that there is a subset of scooters that are also trucks. The second statement is “All trucks are trains.” This means that all trucks are also trains.<\/p>\n
The first conclusion is “Some scooters are trains.” This conclusion follows from the first statement, because if there is a subset of scooters that are also trucks, then some scooters must be trains.<\/p>\n
The second conclusion is “No truck is a scooter.” This conclusion does not follow from the statements, because the statements do not say anything about whether or not there are trucks that are not scooters.<\/p>\n
Therefore, the correct answer is: Only conclusion I follows.<\/p>\n
Here is a more detailed explanation of each option:<\/p>\n
[amp_mcq option1=”Only conclusion I follows” option2=”Only conclusion II follows” option3=”Either I or II follows” option4=”Neither I nor II follows E. Both I and II follow” correct=”option1″]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[723],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-43800","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-logical-deduction","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"\n