{"id":2961,"date":"2024-03-05T15:41:32","date_gmt":"2024-03-05T15:41:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=2961"},"modified":"2024-03-05T15:41:32","modified_gmt":"2024-03-05T15:41:32","slug":"in-which-of-the-following-cases-the-supreme-court-has-discussed-the-constitutional-validity-of-triple-talaq","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-which-of-the-following-cases-the-supreme-court-has-discussed-the-constitutional-validity-of-triple-talaq\/","title":{"rendered":"In which of the following cases the Supreme Court has discussed the Constitutional Validity of Triple Talaq?"},"content":{"rendered":"

[amp_mcq option1=”Shayara Bano Vs. Union of India” option2=”Naz Foundation Vs. Union of India” option3=”Daniel Latifi Vs. Union of India” option4=”Shabnam Hashmi Vs. Union of India ” correct=”option1″]<\/p>\n

The correct answer is (a). In Shayara Bano Vs. Union of India, the Supreme Court of India held that the practice of triple talaq, or instant divorce, is unconstitutional. The court ruled that the practice violates the fundamental rights of Muslim women to equality and dignity. The court also held that the practice is not essential to Islam and that it can be reformed.<\/p>\n

The other options are incorrect. (b) Naz Foundation Vs. Union of India was a case in which the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, which criminalized homosexuality. (c) Daniel Latifi Vs. Union of India was a case in which the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Armed Forces Special Powers Act, which gives the Indian military sweeping powers to operate in areas of conflict. (d) Shabnam Hashmi Vs. Union of India was a case in which the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty.<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court’s decision in Shayara Bano Vs. Union of India was a landmark ruling that has had a significant impact on the lives of Muslim women in India. The ruling has helped to improve the status of Muslim women in India and has made it more difficult for men to divorce their wives without cause.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[amp_mcq option1=”Shayara Bano Vs. Union of India” option2=”Naz Foundation Vs. Union of India” option3=”Daniel Latifi Vs. Union of India” option4=”Shabnam Hashmi Vs. Union of India ” correct=”option1″]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2961","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-law","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"\nIn which of the following cases the Supreme Court has discussed the Constitutional Validity of Triple Talaq?<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The other options are incorrect. (b) Naz Foundation Vs. Union of India was a case in which the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, which criminalized homosexuality. (c) Daniel Latifi Vs. Union of India was a case in which the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Armed Forces Special Powers Act, which gives the Indian military sweeping powers to operate in areas of conflict. (d) Shabnam Hashmi Vs. Union of India was a case in which the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-which-of-the-following-cases-the-supreme-court-has-discussed-the-constitutional-validity-of-triple-talaq\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"In which of the following cases the Supreme Court has discussed the Constitutional Validity of Triple Talaq?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The other options are incorrect. (b) Naz Foundation Vs. Union of India was a case in which the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, which criminalized homosexuality. (c) Daniel Latifi Vs. Union of India was a case in which the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Armed Forces Special Powers Act, which gives the Indian military sweeping powers to operate in areas of conflict. (d) Shabnam Hashmi Vs. Union of India was a case in which the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-which-of-the-following-cases-the-supreme-court-has-discussed-the-constitutional-validity-of-triple-talaq\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-03-05T15:41:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"In which of the following cases the Supreme Court has discussed the Constitutional Validity of Triple Talaq?","description":"The other options are incorrect. (b) Naz Foundation Vs. Union of India was a case in which the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, which criminalized homosexuality. (c) Daniel Latifi Vs. Union of India was a case in which the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Armed Forces Special Powers Act, which gives the Indian military sweeping powers to operate in areas of conflict. (d) Shabnam Hashmi Vs. Union of India was a case in which the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-which-of-the-following-cases-the-supreme-court-has-discussed-the-constitutional-validity-of-triple-talaq\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"In which of the following cases the Supreme Court has discussed the Constitutional Validity of Triple Talaq?","og_description":"The other options are incorrect. (b) Naz Foundation Vs. Union of India was a case in which the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, which criminalized homosexuality. (c) Daniel Latifi Vs. Union of India was a case in which the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Armed Forces Special Powers Act, which gives the Indian military sweeping powers to operate in areas of conflict. (d) Shabnam Hashmi Vs. Union of India was a case in which the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-which-of-the-following-cases-the-supreme-court-has-discussed-the-constitutional-validity-of-triple-talaq\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2024-03-05T15:41:32+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-which-of-the-following-cases-the-supreme-court-has-discussed-the-constitutional-validity-of-triple-talaq\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-which-of-the-following-cases-the-supreme-court-has-discussed-the-constitutional-validity-of-triple-talaq\/","name":"In which of the following cases the Supreme Court has discussed the Constitutional Validity of Triple Talaq?","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-03-05T15:41:32+00:00","dateModified":"2024-03-05T15:41:32+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"The other options are incorrect. (b) Naz Foundation Vs. Union of India was a case in which the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, which criminalized homosexuality. (c) Daniel Latifi Vs. Union of India was a case in which the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Armed Forces Special Powers Act, which gives the Indian military sweeping powers to operate in areas of conflict. (d) Shabnam Hashmi Vs. Union of India was a case in which the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-which-of-the-following-cases-the-supreme-court-has-discussed-the-constitutional-validity-of-triple-talaq\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-which-of-the-following-cases-the-supreme-court-has-discussed-the-constitutional-validity-of-triple-talaq\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-which-of-the-following-cases-the-supreme-court-has-discussed-the-constitutional-validity-of-triple-talaq\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"mcq","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"law","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/mcq\/law\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"In which of the following cases the Supreme Court has discussed the Constitutional Validity of Triple Talaq?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2961","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2961"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2961\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2961"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2961"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2961"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}