[amp_mcq option1=”Yusuf V\/s Sowramma” option2=”A.A. Abdullah V\/s A.B. Mohmuna Syed Bhai” option3=”Secretary, T.N. Wakf Board V\/s Syed Fatima Nachi” option4=”Mohd. Ahrnad Khan V\/s Shah Bano Begum” correct=”option3″]<\/p>\n
The correct answer is (c) Secretary, T.N. Wakf Board V\/s Syed Fatima Nachi.<\/p>\n
In this case, the Supreme Court held that a Muslim divorced woman can apply directly to the Wakf Board when there is no relative to support her. The Court held that the Wakf Board is a public charitable trust and is therefore bound to provide maintenance to a Muslim divorced woman who is unable to support herself.<\/p>\n
The other options are incorrect because they do not deal with the issue of a Muslim divorced woman applying directly to the Wakf Board for maintenance.<\/p>\n
(a) Yusuf V\/s Sowramma is a case about the validity of a Muslim marriage.
\n(b) A.A. Abdullah V\/s A.B. Mohmuna Syed Bhai is a case about the custody of a child after divorce.
\n(d) Mohd. Ahrnad Khan V\/s Shah Bano Begum is a case about the right of a Muslim divorced woman to maintenance from her husband.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
[amp_mcq option1=”Yusuf V\/s Sowramma” option2=”A.A. Abdullah V\/s A.B. Mohmuna Syed Bhai” option3=”Secretary, T.N. Wakf Board V\/s Syed Fatima Nachi” option4=”Mohd. Ahrnad Khan V\/s Shah Bano Begum” correct=”option3″]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[220],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2301","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-family-law","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"\n