{"id":1370,"date":"2024-03-05T15:16:11","date_gmt":"2024-03-05T15:16:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=1370"},"modified":"2024-03-05T15:16:11","modified_gmt":"2024-03-05T15:16:11","slug":"examination-of-witnesses-through-video-conferencing-has-been-approved-by-the-supreme-court-in-which-of-the-following-cases","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/examination-of-witnesses-through-video-conferencing-has-been-approved-by-the-supreme-court-in-which-of-the-following-cases\/","title":{"rendered":"Examination of witnesses through video conferencing has been approved by the Supreme Court in which of the following cases ?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>[amp_mcq option1=&#8221;Rohtas Vs State of Haryana&#8221; option2=&#8221;Chandrappa Vs State of Karnataka&#8221; option3=&#8221;State of Maharashtra Vs Dr. Prafulla B. Desai&#8221; option4=&#8221;Ramswaroop Vs State of Rajasthan  &#8221; correct=&#8221;option3&#8243;]<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>The correct answer is (c) State of Maharashtra Vs Dr. Prafulla B. Desai.<\/p>\n<p>In the case of State of Maharashtra Vs Dr. Prafulla B. Desai, the Supreme Court approved the use of video conferencing for the examination of witnesses in criminal cases. The Court held that video conferencing is a &#8220;useful tool&#8221; that can be used to ensure that witnesses are available to testify in court, even if they are located far away. The Court also noted that video conferencing can help to protect witnesses from intimidation and harassment.<\/p>\n<p>The other options are incorrect. In the case of Rohtas Vs State of Haryana, the Supreme Court held that video conferencing cannot be used to examine witnesses in criminal cases. The Court held that video conferencing is not a reliable method of taking evidence, and that it can lead to miscarriages of justice. In the case of Chandrappa Vs State of Karnataka, the Supreme Court held that video conferencing can be used to examine witnesses in civil cases, but only if the parties agree to it. In the case of Ramswaroop Vs State of Rajasthan, the Supreme Court did not rule on the use of video conferencing for the examination of witnesses.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[amp_mcq option1=&#8221;Rohtas Vs State of Haryana&#8221; option2=&#8221;Chandrappa Vs State of Karnataka&#8221; option3=&#8221;State of Maharashtra Vs Dr. Prafulla B. Desai&#8221; option4=&#8221;Ramswaroop Vs State of Rajasthan &#8221; correct=&#8221;option3&#8243;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1370","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-law","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v22.2 (Yoast SEO v23.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Examination of witnesses through video conferencing has been approved by the Supreme Court in which of the following cases ?<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In the case of State of Maharashtra Vs Dr. Prafulla B. Desai, the Supreme Court approved the use of video conferencing for the examination of witnesses in criminal cases. The Court held that video conferencing is a &quot;useful tool&quot; that can be used to ensure that witnesses are available to testify in court, even if they are located far away. The Court also noted that video conferencing can help to protect witnesses from intimidation and harassment.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/examination-of-witnesses-through-video-conferencing-has-been-approved-by-the-supreme-court-in-which-of-the-following-cases\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Examination of witnesses through video conferencing has been approved by the Supreme Court in which of the following cases ?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In the case of State of Maharashtra Vs Dr. Prafulla B. Desai, the Supreme Court approved the use of video conferencing for the examination of witnesses in criminal cases. The Court held that video conferencing is a &quot;useful tool&quot; that can be used to ensure that witnesses are available to testify in court, even if they are located far away. The Court also noted that video conferencing can help to protect witnesses from intimidation and harassment.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/examination-of-witnesses-through-video-conferencing-has-been-approved-by-the-supreme-court-in-which-of-the-following-cases\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-03-05T15:16:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Examination of witnesses through video conferencing has been approved by the Supreme Court in which of the following cases ?","description":"In the case of State of Maharashtra Vs Dr. Prafulla B. Desai, the Supreme Court approved the use of video conferencing for the examination of witnesses in criminal cases. The Court held that video conferencing is a \"useful tool\" that can be used to ensure that witnesses are available to testify in court, even if they are located far away. The Court also noted that video conferencing can help to protect witnesses from intimidation and harassment.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/examination-of-witnesses-through-video-conferencing-has-been-approved-by-the-supreme-court-in-which-of-the-following-cases\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Examination of witnesses through video conferencing has been approved by the Supreme Court in which of the following cases ?","og_description":"In the case of State of Maharashtra Vs Dr. Prafulla B. Desai, the Supreme Court approved the use of video conferencing for the examination of witnesses in criminal cases. The Court held that video conferencing is a \"useful tool\" that can be used to ensure that witnesses are available to testify in court, even if they are located far away. The Court also noted that video conferencing can help to protect witnesses from intimidation and harassment.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/examination-of-witnesses-through-video-conferencing-has-been-approved-by-the-supreme-court-in-which-of-the-following-cases\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2024-03-05T15:16:11+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/examination-of-witnesses-through-video-conferencing-has-been-approved-by-the-supreme-court-in-which-of-the-following-cases\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/examination-of-witnesses-through-video-conferencing-has-been-approved-by-the-supreme-court-in-which-of-the-following-cases\/","name":"Examination of witnesses through video conferencing has been approved by the Supreme Court in which of the following cases ?","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-03-05T15:16:11+00:00","dateModified":"2024-03-05T15:16:11+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"In the case of State of Maharashtra Vs Dr. Prafulla B. Desai, the Supreme Court approved the use of video conferencing for the examination of witnesses in criminal cases. The Court held that video conferencing is a \"useful tool\" that can be used to ensure that witnesses are available to testify in court, even if they are located far away. The Court also noted that video conferencing can help to protect witnesses from intimidation and harassment.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/examination-of-witnesses-through-video-conferencing-has-been-approved-by-the-supreme-court-in-which-of-the-following-cases\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/examination-of-witnesses-through-video-conferencing-has-been-approved-by-the-supreme-court-in-which-of-the-following-cases\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/examination-of-witnesses-through-video-conferencing-has-been-approved-by-the-supreme-court-in-which-of-the-following-cases\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"mcq","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"law","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/mcq\/law\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"Examination of witnesses through video conferencing has been approved by the Supreme Court in which of the following cases ?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1370","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1370"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1370\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1370"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1370"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1370"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}