{"id":1205,"date":"2024-03-05T15:13:42","date_gmt":"2024-03-05T15:13:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=1205"},"modified":"2024-03-05T15:13:42","modified_gmt":"2024-03-05T15:13:42","slug":"in-which-case-section-27-of-indian-evidence-act-was-held-by-the-court-to-be-constitutionally-valid","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-which-case-section-27-of-indian-evidence-act-was-held-by-the-court-to-be-constitutionally-valid\/","title":{"rendered":"In which case Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act was held by the Court to be Constitutionally valid ?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\r\n    <!-- Check if it's an AMP page -->\r\n            <!-- Non-AMP version -->\r\n        <div class=\"mcq-container\" data-quiz-id=\"quizState_6a97d9aea9176\">\r\n                                            <div class=\"option\" data-option-key=\"option1\" data-is-correct=\"true\">\r\n                    Nathu V State of UP                <\/div>\r\n                                            <div class=\"option\" data-option-key=\"option2\" data-is-correct=\"false\">\r\n                    Ram Bharose V State of UP                <\/div>\r\n                                            <div class=\"option\" data-option-key=\"option3\" data-is-correct=\"false\">\r\n                    Devman Upadhayaya V State of UP                <\/div>\r\n                                            <div class=\"option\" data-option-key=\"option4\" data-is-correct=\"false\">\r\n                    Pakkala Narayan Swami V Emperor                   <\/div>\r\n                            \r\n            <!-- Feedback messages for non-AMP -->\r\n            <div class=\"feedback\" data-feedback=\"wrong\">Answer is Right!<\/div>\r\n            <div class=\"feedback\" data-feedback=\"right\">Answer is Wrong!<\/div>\r\n        <\/div>\r\n\r\n        <script>\r\n        document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function () {\r\n            var containers = document.querySelectorAll('.mcq-container');\r\n\r\n            containers.forEach(function(container) {\r\n                var options = container.querySelectorAll('.option');\r\n                var feedbackSelect = container.querySelector('[data-feedback=\"select\"]');\r\n                var feedbackWrong = container.querySelector('[data-feedback=\"wrong\"]');\r\n                var feedbackRight = container.querySelector('[data-feedback=\"right\"]');\r\n\r\n                options.forEach(function(option) {\r\n                    option.addEventListener('click', function() {\r\n                        var selectedOption = option.getAttribute('data-option-key');\r\n                        var isCorrect = option.getAttribute('data-is-correct') === 'true';\r\n\r\n                        \/\/ Remove previous selections\r\n                        options.forEach(function(opt) {\r\n                            opt.classList.remove('correct', 'incorrect');\r\n                        });\r\n\r\n                        \/\/ Add the correct\/incorrect class\r\n                        if (isCorrect) {\r\n                            option.classList.add('correct');\r\n                            feedbackRight.hidden = false;\r\n                            feedbackWrong.hidden = true;\r\n                        } else {\r\n                            option.classList.add('incorrect');\r\n                            feedbackRight.hidden = true;\r\n                            feedbackWrong.hidden = false;\r\n                        }\r\n\r\n                        \/\/ Hide select feedback\r\n                        feedbackSelect.hidden = true;\r\n                    });\r\n                });\r\n            });\r\n        });\r\n        <\/script>\r\n    \r\n    <!--more--><\/p>\n<p>The correct answer is (a).<\/p>\n<p>In the case of Nathu v. State of UP, the Supreme Court held that Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act is <div class=\"youtube-subscribe-container\">\r\n        <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCNHT8lW-JmLC68rjBfZhdkg?sub_confirmation=1\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"youtube-subscribe-button\">\r\n            <span class=\"youtube-icon\">\r\n                <svg xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox=\"0 0 576 512\">\r\n                    <path d=\"M549.7 124.1c-6.3-23.7-24.8-42.3-48.3-48.6C458.8 64 288 64 288 64S117.2 64 74.6 75.5c-23.5 6.3-42 24.9-48.3 48.6-11.4 42.9-11.4 132.3-11.4 132.3s0 89.4 11.4 132.3c6.3 23.7 24.8 41.5 48.3 47.8C117.2 448 288 448 288 448s170.8 0 213.4-11.5c23.5-6.3 42-24.2 48.3-47.8 11.4-42.9 11.4-132.3 11.4-132.3s0-89.4-11.4-132.3zm-317.5 213.5V175.2l142.7 <div class=\"telegram-channel-container\">\r\n        <a href=\"https:\/\/t.me\/pscnotes2025\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"telegram-channel-button\">\r\n            <span class=\"telegram-icon\">\r\n                <svg xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox=\"0 0 496 512\">\r\n                    <path fill=\"white\" d=\"M248,8C111,8,0,119,0,256s111,248,248,248s248-111,248-248S385,8,248,8z M362,177L320,367c-3,14-10,18-20,14l-56-41l-27,26 c-3,3-5,5-10,5l4-63L323,196c5-5-1-7-8-3l-98,62l-42-13c-9-3-10-9,2-14l162-63C351,160,365,164,362,177z\"\/>\r\n                <\/svg>\r\n            <\/span>\r\n            Join Our Telegram Channel\r\n        <\/a>\r\n    <\/div> 81.2-142.7 81.2z\"\/>\r\n                <\/svg>\r\n            <\/span>\r\n            Subscribe on YouTube\r\n        <\/a>\r\n    <\/div> constitutionally valid. Section 27 states that no one can be compelled to be a witness against himself. The Court held that this provision is essential for the protection of the individual&#8217;s right against self-incrimination.<\/p>\n<p>The other options are incorrect because they do not involve the issue of Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act.<\/p>\n<p>(b) Ram Bharose v. State of UP is a case about the admissibility of evidence. The Court held that evidence obtained through illegal means is not admissible in court.<\/p>\n<p>(c) Devman Upadhyaya v. State of UP is a case about the right to silence. The Court held that a person has the right to remain silent and cannot be compelled to answer questions by the police.<\/p>\n<p>(d) Pakkala Narayan Swami v. Emperor is a case about the right to counsel. The Court held that a person has the right to be represented by a lawyer during criminal proceedings.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subscribe on YouTube<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v22.2 (Yoast SEO v23.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>In which case Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act was held by the Court to be Constitutionally valid ?<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In the case of Nathu v. State of UP, the Supreme Court held that Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act is constitutionally valid. Section 27 states that no one can be compelled to be a witness against himself. The Court held that this provision is essential for the protection of the individual&#039;s right against self-incrimination.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-which-case-section-27-of-indian-evidence-act-was-held-by-the-court-to-be-constitutionally-valid\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"In which case Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act was held by the Court to be Constitutionally valid ?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In the case of Nathu v. State of UP, the Supreme Court held that Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act is constitutionally valid. Section 27 states that no one can be compelled to be a witness against himself. The Court held that this provision is essential for the protection of the individual&#039;s right against self-incrimination.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-which-case-section-27-of-indian-evidence-act-was-held-by-the-court-to-be-constitutionally-valid\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-03-05T15:13:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"In which case Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act was held by the Court to be Constitutionally valid ?","description":"In the case of Nathu v. State of UP, the Supreme Court held that Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act is constitutionally valid. Section 27 states that no one can be compelled to be a witness against himself. The Court held that this provision is essential for the protection of the individual's right against self-incrimination.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-which-case-section-27-of-indian-evidence-act-was-held-by-the-court-to-be-constitutionally-valid\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"In which case Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act was held by the Court to be Constitutionally valid ?","og_description":"In the case of Nathu v. State of UP, the Supreme Court held that Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act is constitutionally valid. Section 27 states that no one can be compelled to be a witness against himself. The Court held that this provision is essential for the protection of the individual's right against self-incrimination.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-which-case-section-27-of-indian-evidence-act-was-held-by-the-court-to-be-constitutionally-valid\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2024-03-05T15:13:42+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-which-case-section-27-of-indian-evidence-act-was-held-by-the-court-to-be-constitutionally-valid\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-which-case-section-27-of-indian-evidence-act-was-held-by-the-court-to-be-constitutionally-valid\/","name":"In which case Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act was held by the Court to be Constitutionally valid ?","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-03-05T15:13:42+00:00","dateModified":"2024-03-05T15:13:42+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"In the case of Nathu v. State of UP, the Supreme Court held that Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act is constitutionally valid. Section 27 states that no one can be compelled to be a witness against himself. The Court held that this provision is essential for the protection of the individual's right against self-incrimination.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-which-case-section-27-of-indian-evidence-act-was-held-by-the-court-to-be-constitutionally-valid\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-which-case-section-27-of-indian-evidence-act-was-held-by-the-court-to-be-constitutionally-valid\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-which-case-section-27-of-indian-evidence-act-was-held-by-the-court-to-be-constitutionally-valid\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"mcq","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"law","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/mcq\/law\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"In which case Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act was held by the Court to be Constitutionally valid ?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d97f17072bfa490596c8f78363955d55?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d97f17072bfa490596c8f78363955d55?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1205"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1205"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1205\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1205"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1205"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1205"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}