With reference to the discussions on Uniform Civil Code in the Supreme Court, consider the following statements: Provision for UCC in the constitution is justiciable. Goa has a UCC. Which of the above statements is/are true?

Only 1 is correct
Only 2 is correct
Which of the above statements is/are true? A. Only 1 is correct B. Only 2 is correct C. Neither 1 nor 2 is correct
Both 1 and 2 are correct

The correct answer is: Only 2 is correct.

The provision for UCC in the constitution is not justiciable. This means that the Supreme Court cannot force the government to implement a UCC. However, Goa does have a UCC, which was implemented in 1962. The UCC in Goa applies to all Goans, regardless of their religion. It covers matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, and adoption.

The Supreme Court has discussed the issue of UCC on several occasions. In 1985, the Court ruled that the government is not bound to implement a UCC, but that it should take steps to promote uniformity in personal laws. In 2017, the Court again reiterated that the government has the power to implement a UCC, but that it is not mandatory.

The issue of UCC is a complex one, and there is no easy solution. There are strong arguments for and against a UCC. Those who support a UCC argue that it would promote equality and justice, and that it would simplify the legal system. Those who oppose a UCC argue that it would violate religious freedom, and that it would be difficult to implement.

The government has not yet taken any concrete steps to implement a UCC. However, the issue is likely to continue to be debated in the future.

Exit mobile version