Which one of the following sections of Indian Evidence has been substituted by the Information Technology Act, 2000 ?

Section 29
Section 35
Section 39
Section 40

The correct answer is (b), Section 35 of the Indian Evidence Act has been substituted by the Information Technology Act, 2000.

Section 35 of the Indian Evidence Act deals with the admissibility of electronic evidence. The Information Technology Act, 2000 has amended this section to provide for the admissibility of electronic evidence in court.

The amendment to Section 35 of the Indian Evidence Act provides that electronic evidence is admissible in court if it is in the form of a document, a computer output, a copy of a document or a computer output, or an extract from a document or a computer output.

The amendment also provides that electronic evidence is admissible in court if it is certified by a person who is authorized to certify electronic evidence.

The amendment to Section 35 of the Indian Evidence Act has made it easier for electronic evidence to be admissible in court. This is important because electronic evidence is often used in criminal and civil cases.

The other options are incorrect because they are not sections of the Indian Evidence Act that have been substituted by the Information Technology Act, 2000.