Which one of the following is not correct in relation to an order of s

Which one of the following is not correct in relation to an order of suspension of an enrolled member of the Central Industrial Security Force?

An enrolled member of the Force is deemed to have been placed under suspension by an order of the appointing authority with effect from the date of detention if he/she is detained in custody, whether on a criminal charge or otherwise, for a period exceeding 48 hours.
An order of suspension made or deemed to have been made continues to remain in force until it is modified or revoked by the authority competent to do so.
An order of suspension made or deemed to have been made can be modified or revoked at any time by any authority to which the authority who had issued the order of suspension is subordinate.
An enrolled member cannot be kept under suspension for more than 180 days.
This question was previously asked in
UPSC CISF-AC-EXE – 2018
Central Industrial Security Force Rules, 2001, Rule 32 deals with suspension. While Rule 32(6) mandates periodic review of suspension orders (before 90 days and subsequently before 180 days from the date of extension), it does not prescribe an absolute maximum period like 180 days for the entire duration of suspension. Suspension can continue beyond 180 days, subject to timely reviews by the competent authority or a review committee. Therefore, the statement that an enrolled member cannot be kept under suspension for more than 180 days is incorrect.
CISF Rules require periodic review of suspension orders but do not impose an absolute upper limit of 180 days on the total duration of suspension.
Options A, B, and C are consistent with the provisions of Rule 32 of the CISF Rules, 2001. Deemed suspension after 48 hours in custody is covered by Rule 32(2)(a). The continuation and modification/revocation of suspension orders by the competent authority or a superior authority are covered by Rule 32(5).