Which of the following statement(s) is /are false ?
- Wage Boards are tripartite in nature, with representatives from workers, employers and independent members
- Except for the Wage Boards for Journalists and Non-Journalists, all the other wage boards are statutory in nature
- Second National Commission on Labour has recommended against the utility of wage boards
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
1 only
2 only
1 and 2 only
1, 2 and 3
Answer is Right!
Answer is Wrong!
This question was previously asked in
UPSC CDS-1 – 2016
Statement 1 is correct; Wage Boards are indeed tripartite bodies comprising representatives of workers, employers, and independent members. Statement 3 is correct; the Second National Commission on Labour (2002) recommended phasing out the system of Wage Boards, suggesting minimum wages be determined by expert committees instead. Statement 2 is false; most Wage Boards set up in India were non-statutory, meaning their recommendations were not legally binding unless specifically accepted and notified by the government. Only the recommendations of the Wage Boards for Working Journalists and Non-Journalist Newspaper Employees, once accepted by the government, have statutory backing under specific Acts. Therefore, the claim that *all* other wage boards are statutory is incorrect.
Understanding the nature (statutory vs. non-statutory) and composition (tripartite) of Wage Boards in India, and the recommendations of the Second National Commission on Labour is important.