Which coding technique/s exhibit/s the usability of fixed length codes? A. Lempel Ziv B. Huffman C. Both A and B D. None of the above

[amp_mcq option1=”Lempel Ziv” option2=”Huffman” option3=”Both A and B” option4=”None of the above” correct=”option1″]

The correct answer is: None of the above.

Fixed-length codes are codes in which each symbol is represented by a fixed number of bits. This is in contrast to variable-length codes, in which each symbol can be represented by a different number of bits.

Lempel-Ziv coding is a family of lossless data compression algorithms. It is a variable-length code, which means that each symbol can be represented by a different number of bits.

Huffman coding is a lossless data compression algorithm that uses a variable-length code. It is based on the idea that some symbols are more likely to occur than others. The symbols that are more likely to occur are assigned shorter codes than the symbols that are less likely to occur.

Therefore, neither Lempel-Ziv coding nor Huffman coding exhibit the usability of fixed-length codes.

Exit mobile version