Which architecture in digital signal processor reduces the execution time? A. Harvard B. CISC C. Program storage D. Von Neumann

[amp_mcq option1=”Harvard” option2=”CISC” option3=”Program storage” option4=”Von Neumann” correct=”option1″]

The correct answer is A. Harvard architecture.

Harvard architecture is a computer architecture that separates the program storage from the data storage. This allows the processor to access instructions and data at the same time, which can significantly reduce the execution time.

CISC (Complex Instruction Set Computing) architecture is a type of computer architecture that uses a complex instruction set. This means that the processor can perform a variety of operations with a single instruction. However, CISC architectures can be less efficient than RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computing) architectures, because they require more transistors to implement.

Program storage is the area of memory where the program is stored. Data storage is the area of memory where the data is stored. In a Von Neumann architecture, the program and data are stored in the same area of memory. This can slow down the execution time, because the processor has to switch between the program and data storage.

In conclusion, Harvard architecture is the best architecture for digital signal processors because it reduces the execution time.

Exit mobile version