Where persons reciprocally promise, firstly to do certain things which are legal and secondly under specified circumstances, to do certain other things which are illegal. Select the correct option.

The first set of promise is a contract, but the second is a void agreement
The entire contract is void
The entire contract is valid
The entire contract is voidable

The correct answer is: The entire contract is void.

A contract is an agreement between two or more parties that creates an obligation to do or not do something. A void contract is a contract that is not legally binding. This means that the parties to the contract are not legally obligated to fulfill their promises.

There are a number of reasons why a contract may be void. One reason is if the contract is for an illegal purpose. For example, a contract to commit a crime is void. Another reason is if the contract is not supported by consideration. Consideration is something of value that is exchanged between the parties to a contract. If there is no consideration, then the contract is void.

In the case where persons reciprocally promise, firstly to do certain things which are legal and secondly under specified circumstances, to do certain other things which are illegal, the entire contract is void. This is because the illegal part of the contract makes the entire contract void. The parties to the contract are not legally obligated to fulfill their promises, even if the legal part of the contract is valid.

Here is a brief explanation of each option:

  • Option A: The first set of promise is a contract, but the second is a void agreement. This option is incorrect because the entire contract is void, not just the second part.
  • Option B: The entire contract is void. This option is correct because the illegal part of the contract makes the entire contract void.
  • Option C: The entire contract is valid. This option is incorrect because the entire contract is void.
  • Option D: The entire contract is voidable. This option is incorrect because the entire contract is void, not voidable.