What is/are the consequence/consequences of a country becoming the mem

What is/are the consequence/consequences of a country becoming the member of the ‘Nuclear Suppliers Group’?

  • 1. It will have access to the latest and most efficient nuclear technologies.
  • 2. It automatically becomes a member of “The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT)”.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?

1 only
2 only
Both 1 and 2
Neither 1 nor 2
This question was previously asked in
UPSC IAS – 2018
Statement 1 is correct. Membership in the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) facilitates trade in nuclear material, equipment, and technology for peaceful purposes among member states. Being an NSG member allows a country access to the latest and most efficient nuclear technologies from other member countries, provided they adhere to the NSG guidelines and safeguards.
Statement 2 is incorrect. NSG membership and the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) membership are separate. NSG guidelines require members to be parties to the NPT as non-nuclear-weapon states or to meet certain non-proliferation commitments. However, NSG membership does not automatically make a country an NPT member. India, for instance, is not a member of the NPT (as it possesses nuclear weapons and views the treaty as discriminatory) but received a specific waiver from the NSG in 2008 allowing it to engage in nuclear commerce. India is seeking full NSG membership but is not an NPT member.
– NSG membership allows access to global nuclear trade and technology for peaceful uses under safeguards.
– NSG membership and NPT membership are not the same.
– NSG members are generally required to adhere to non-proliferation commitments, often including being NPT members (though exceptions/waivers exist).
The NSG is a group of nuclear supplier countries that aims to prevent nuclear proliferation by controlling the export of materials, equipment, and technology that can be used to manufacture nuclear weapons.
Exit mobile version