There was no jest . . . . . . . . his poverty. A. with B. for C. at D. in

with
for
at
in

The correct answer is: A. with

The word “jest” means “a joke or trick, especially one that is played for amusement.” The word “for” means “in order to achieve or obtain.” The word “at” means “in the direction of.” The word “in” means “within.”

In the sentence “There was no jest with his poverty,” the word “jest” is being used in the sense of “a joke or trick.” The sentence is saying that there was no joke or trick being made at the expense of the person’s poverty.

The other options are not correct because they do not make sense in the context of the sentence. The word “for” would imply that the person’s poverty was being used as a means to achieve or obtain something. The word “at” would imply that the person’s poverty was being directed at someone or something. The word “in” would imply that the person’s poverty was located within something.