The occupation of which of the following regions led the Ho Uprising?

Occupation of Singhbhum
Occupation of Chota Nagpur
Occupation of Kalahandi
None of the above

The correct answer is: B. Occupation of Chota Nagpur

The Ho Uprising was a rebellion by the Ho people of Chota Nagpur against the British East India Company in 1831-1832. The uprising was led by Birsa Munda, a Ho religious leader who preached a return to traditional Ho customs and values. The Ho people were unhappy with the British rule, which they saw as oppressive and exploitative. They were also concerned about the loss of their land and traditional way of life. The uprising was ultimately unsuccessful, but it did lead to some reforms by the British government.

The occupation of Chota Nagpur by the British East India Company began in the early 18th century. The British were interested in the region’s mineral resources, and they began to establish control over the area. The Ho people were initially resistant to British rule, but they were eventually subdued. The British imposed a number of taxes on the Ho people, and they also forced them to work on plantations. The Ho people were unhappy with British rule, and they began to resist it in the early 19th century.

The Ho Uprising was a major event in the history of the Ho people. It was a significant example of resistance to British rule, and it led to some reforms by the British government. The uprising also helped to raise awareness of the Ho people and their culture.

The other options are incorrect because they do not refer to the region where the Ho Uprising took place. Option A refers to the occupation of Singhbhum, which is a different region from Chota Nagpur. Option C refers to the occupation of Kalahandi, which is also a different region from Chota Nagpur. Option D is incorrect because it states that none of the above regions led the Ho Uprising.

Exit mobile version