The correct answer is: a) Extensive historical research.
The lack of direct evidence about Sikkim’s involvement in the Revolt makes it a topic of extensive historical research. This is because historians are interested in understanding the full extent of the Revolt and its impact on different parts of India. Sikkim is a small state in the Himalayas, and it is possible that it was involved in the Revolt, but there is no direct evidence to support this. Historians need to rely on indirect evidence, such as reports from British officials, to piece together what happened in Sikkim during the Revolt. This makes it a difficult topic to research, but it is an important one, as it helps us to understand the full impact of the Revolt.
The other options are incorrect because:
- b) Speculation and inference are not reliable methods of historical research. Historians need to rely on evidence to support their claims.
- c) Nationalist myth-making is the creation of stories that glorify a nation or its people. This is not an accurate way to understand history.
- d) The Revolt was a major event in Indian history, and it is relevant to historians.