The Halagali Revolt in Karnataka was primarily driven by:

Dissatisfaction with British taxation policies
Exploitation by local Zamindars
Religious grievances
Fear of conscription into the army

The correct answer is: A) Dissatisfaction with British taxation policies.

The Halagali Revolt was a peasant uprising that took place in the Halagali taluk of Bellary district in Karnataka, India, in 1830. The revolt was led by a peasant named Huligamma, and it was primarily driven by dissatisfaction with British taxation policies.

The British had imposed a number of new taxes on the peasants, including a tax on land, a tax on cattle, and a tax on salt. These taxes were very burdensome for the peasants, who were already struggling to make ends meet. The British also imposed a number of restrictions on the peasants, such as a ban on growing certain crops and a ban on carrying weapons. These restrictions further angered the peasants.

The revolt began when Huligamma and her followers attacked a British tax collector. The revolt quickly spread to other parts of the taluk, and the British were forced to send troops to suppress it. The revolt was eventually put down, but it had a significant impact on British policy in India. The British realized that they needed to be more careful about how they taxed the peasants, and they also realized that they needed to be more sensitive to the needs of the peasants.

The other options are incorrect because:

  • Option B is incorrect because the Halagali Revolt was not primarily driven by exploitation by local Zamindars. The Zamindars were local landlords who collected taxes on behalf of the British. While the Zamindars were often seen as corrupt and oppressive, there is no evidence that they were the primary cause of the Halagali Revolt.
  • Option C is incorrect because the Halagali Revolt was not primarily driven by religious grievances. The revolt was not motivated by any religious conflict between Hindus and Muslims.
  • Option D is incorrect because the Halagali Revolt was not primarily driven by fear of conscription into the army. The British did not conscript peasants into the army, and there is no evidence that this was a concern of the peasants who participated in the revolt.
Exit mobile version