The correct answer is: d) All of the above.
The government’s response to social movements in Arunachal Pradesh has sometimes involved dialogue and negotiation, suppression and use of force, and concessions and policy reforms.
Dialogue and negotiation are often used by the government to try to resolve social conflicts peacefully. This can involve meeting with representatives of the social movement to discuss their grievances and try to find a solution that is acceptable to both sides.
Suppression and use of force are sometimes used by the government to try to stop social movements from gaining momentum. This can involve using the police or military to arrest or intimidate activists, or to break up protests.
Concessions and policy reforms are sometimes used by the government to try to appease social movements. This can involve making changes to laws or policies that are seen as unfair or discriminatory.
The government’s response to social movements in Arunachal Pradesh has been varied and has often been criticized. Some people argue that the government has been too quick to use force to suppress social movements, while others argue that the government has not done enough to address the grievances of the people.
The government’s response to social movements in Arunachal Pradesh is likely to continue to be a source of debate and controversy in the future.