The British East India Company annexed the Rania principality due to the reason of

Revolt by Nawab Jabit Khan.
Incapability of Rani Ram Kaur and Interference of Jodh Singh.
Death of Maya Daya Kaur.
Death of Bhai Uday Singh without his successor.

The correct answer is: D. Death of Bhai Uday Singh without his successor.

The Rania principality was a princely state in the Indian subcontinent that existed from the 17th century to the 19th century. It was located in the present-day state of Rajasthan, India. The principality was founded by Bhai Uday Singh in the 17th century. Bhai Uday Singh was a Rajput warrior who fought against the Mughal Empire. He was successful in defeating the Mughals and establishing his own principality.

The Rania principality was ruled by a succession of rulers from the Uday Singh dynasty. The last ruler of the principality was Bhai Uday Singh’s grandson, Bhai Jaswant Singh. Bhai Jaswant Singh died in 1818 without a successor. This led to a power struggle within the principality. The British East India Company took advantage of this power struggle and annexed the Rania principality in 1820.

The annexation of the Rania principality was a major blow to the Rajputs. It marked the end of an independent Rajput state and the beginning of British rule in Rajasthan.

The other options are incorrect because:

  • Option A is incorrect because Nawab Jabit Khan was a Mughal general who fought against the Rania principality. He was not involved in the annexation of the principality by the British East India Company.
  • Option B is incorrect because Rani Ram Kaur was the queen of the Rania principality. She was not involved in the annexation of the principality by the British East India Company.
  • Option C is incorrect because Maya Daya Kaur was the queen mother of the Rania principality. She was not involved in the annexation of the principality by the British East India Company.
Exit mobile version