The age of ‘E’ is twice the age of ‘S’. To find out the difference in

The age of ‘E’ is twice the age of ‘S’. To find out the difference in their ages, which of the following information is/are sufficient ?
I. After five years, the ratio of their ages would be 9 : 5
II. Before ten years, the ratio of their ages was 3 : 1

Only I
Only II
Either I or II
Both I and II
This question was previously asked in
UPSC CAPF – 2015
Let E be the current age of E and S be the current age of S.
Given: E = 2S. We need to find the difference E – S.
Statement I: After five years, the ratio of their ages is 9:5. So, (E+5)/(S+5) = 9/5. Substituting E=2S, we get (2S+5)/(S+5) = 9/5. This is a linear equation in S, which can be solved to find a unique value for S. Since S can be determined, E can also be determined, and thus the difference E-S can be found. So, Statement I alone is sufficient.
Statement II: Before ten years, the ratio of their ages was 3:1. So, (E-10)/(S-10) = 3/1. Substituting E=2S, we get (2S-10)/(S-10) = 3/1. This is a linear equation in S, which can be solved to find a unique value for S. Since S can be determined, E can also be determined, and thus the difference E-S can be found. So, Statement II alone is sufficient.
Since either statement alone provides enough information to find the difference in their ages, the answer is C.
The question asks whether the given information is sufficient to find the difference in ages. We are given a relationship between their current ages. Each statement provides an additional relationship at a different point in time. We need to check if this system of equations allows us to find the specific ages or their difference.
From Statement I: 5(2S+5) = 9(S+5) => 10S + 25 = 9S + 45 => S = 20. E = 2*20 = 40. Difference = 20.
From Statement II: (2S-10) = 3(S-10) => 2S – 10 = 3S – 30 => S = 20. E = 2*20 = 40. Difference = 20.
Both statements lead to the same ages and difference, confirming that each is independently sufficient.