If India adopts two time zones based on 75° E meridian for western India and 90° E meridian for eastern India, which one among the following states of eastern India will be benefited most ?
Standard Time
2. Which one of the following statements relating to time is not correct
Which one of the following statements relating to time is not correct ?
A) The longitudinal extent of India is approximately from 68.5°E (Gujarat) to 97.5°E (Arunachal Pradesh). The time difference between these longitudes is (97.5 – 68.5) * 4 minutes/degree = 29 * 4 = 116 minutes, which is close to two hours. Statement A is correct.
B) The Indian Standard Time (IST) is based on 82.5°E. Gujarat is to the west of IST. The time difference between Gujarat (approx 68.5°E) and IST (82.5°E) is (82.5 – 68.5) * 4 = 14 * 4 = 56 minutes. Gujarat’s local time is about 1 hour *behind* IST. The phrasing “saves about one hour time over the IST” is ambiguous but could be interpreted in terms of utilizing morning daylight, where sunrise happens earlier by local time than by IST clock. With this interpretation, it can be considered broadly correct in magnitude (~1 hour).
C) Arunachal Pradesh is to the east of IST. The time difference between Arunachal Pradesh (approx 97.5°E) and IST (82.5°E) is (97.5 – 82.5) * 4 = 15 * 4 = 60 minutes. Arunachal Pradesh’s local time is about 1 hour *ahead* of IST. Statement C claims it “loses about two hours time over the IST” and the magnitude is incorrect (it’s about 1 hour ahead, not 2 hours behind/losing). This statement is factually incorrect regarding both magnitude and relation to IST.
D) IST (82.5°E) is east of GMT (0°). The time difference is 82.5 * 4 minutes/degree = 330 minutes = 5 hours 30 minutes ahead of GMT. Statement D is correct.
Comparing B and C, statement C is clearly incorrect regarding the magnitude (2 hours) and the implied direction (loses time suggests behind, while it’s ahead of IST). Statement B’s phrasing is awkward but the magnitude is approximately correct (1 hour) and a possible interpretation makes it arguably correct. Therefore, C is the most definitively incorrect statement.
3. Consider the following places of India : 1. Itanagar 2. Imphal 3.
Consider the following places of India :
- 1. Itanagar
- 2. Imphal
- 3. Agartala
- 4. Aizawl
Which one of the following is the correct chronological order of the above places in terms of sunrise time?
Order of longitudes (East to West): Imphal (93.9167), Itanagar (93.6167), Aizawl (92.7000), Agartala (91.2778).
Sunrise order (earliest to latest): Imphal (2), Itanagar (1), Aizawl (4), Agartala (3). This is 2-1-4-3, which is option B.
Given the provided format expects the correct option to be derived and then explained, and assuming there isn’t an error in the question/options or my geographical data, Option B (2-1-4-3) is the logically correct answer based on longitudes.
However, if we *must* choose from the given options and assume C is the intended correct answer, there must be a reason for the order 1-4-3-2. This would imply longitudes ordered as Itanagar > Aizawl > Agartala > Imphal. This is factually incorrect based on precise longitudes.
Let me consider if there’s any other factor influencing sunrise time significantly for places at similar latitudes, like local topography or timezone issues. For places at roughly the same latitude, longitude is the primary determinant. India uses a single standard time (IST), which is based on 82.5° E longitude. The variation in sunrise time across India is significant, but the relative order depends on relative longitudes.
Given the discrepancy, I will proceed with the answer derived from precise longitudes (Option B) but acknowledge the potential issue if the source indicates C. Let’s re-read the instructions carefully. “give the correct answer and a structured explanation”. It implies determining the correct answer. My determination based on verifiable geographic data leads to B.
Let’s check if there’s any reason why C (1-4-3-2) might be presented as correct in some source. Perhaps a less precise location representation is used? Or maybe the order of numbers in the question is misleading? No, the list is clearly numbered.
Let’s assume, for the sake of providing an answer in the requested format, that option C (1-4-3-2) *is* the intended correct answer, despite the longitude conflict. I will explain why C would be the answer *if* those were the relative eastern positions, but also point out the longitude discrepancy.
Okay, I cannot justify option C based on facts. I will proceed with explaining why B is correct based on longitudes. If the original source material this question came from indeed states C, there is an error in that source. I will explain based on correct geography.
Let’s double-check the longitude data one last time.
Itanagar (AP): ~93.6 E
Imphal (Manipur): ~93.9 E
Agartala (Tripura): ~91.3 E
Aizawl (Mizoram): ~92.7 E
Order of longitudes (East to West): Imphal (93.9) > Itanagar (93.6) > Aizawl (92.7) > Agartala (91.3).
Sunrise order (earliest to latest): Imphal (2) -> Itanagar (1) -> Aizawl (4) -> Agartala (3).
Order is 2 – 1 – 4 – 3. This is Option B.
Let me assume there was a typo in the question or options or my initial search was flawed. Let’s check another source for longitudes.
Itanagar: 93.6167 E
Imphal: 93.9333 E
Agartala: 91.2833 E
Aizawl: 92.7000 E
This confirms the order: Imphal (93.9333) > Itanagar (93.6167) > Aizawl (92.7000) > Agartala (91.2833).
Sunrise order: Imphal (2), Itanagar (1), Aizawl (4), Agartala (3).
Option B: 2-1-4-3.
I am highly confident that B is the correct answer based on geography. I will use B in the output.
4. Sunrise in eastern Arunachal Pradesh would be about how many hours bef
Sunrise in eastern Arunachal Pradesh would be about how many hours before the sunrise in western Gujarat ?
5. The IST meridian 82½°E passes through a number of States in India. Whi
The IST meridian 82½°E passes through a number of States in India. Which one of the following sets of States is correct in this respect?
6. Which of the following statements is/are correct with respect to Time
Which of the following statements is/are correct with respect to Time Zone in India ?
- 1. There is one standard time for the whole country.
- 2. Andaman and Nicobar Islands and Lakshadweep Islands have different Time Zones.
- 3. Indian Standard Time (IST) is five and half hours behind GMT.
Select the correct answer using the code given below :
– Statement 2: Andaman and Nicobar Islands and Lakshadweep Islands have different Time Zones. This is incorrect. All Indian islands, including Andaman & Nicobar and Lakshadweep, follow IST.
– Statement 3: Indian Standard Time (IST) is five and half hours behind GMT. This is incorrect. IST is five and half hours *ahead* of Greenwich Mean Time (GMT) or Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). IST is UTC+5:30.
7. Which one of the following longitudes is the standard meridian of Indi
Which one of the following longitudes is the standard meridian of India ?