Act passed under the British Crown

11. “A” is a warehouse keeper. “Z” is going on a journey and entrusts his

“A” is a warehouse keeper. “Z” is going on a journey and entrusts his furniture to “A” under a contract that it shall be returned on a payment of a stipulated sum for warehouse room. “A” dishonestly sells the goods. “A” has committed the offence of

Subscribe on YouTube
Dishonest Misappropriation of Property.
Criminal Breach of Trust.
Theft.
Dishonest Holding of Property.
This question was previously asked in
UPSC CISF-AC-EXE – 2021
Download PDFAttempt Online
The correct answer is B) Criminal Breach of Trust.
“A”, being a warehouse keeper, was entrusted with Z’s furniture under a contract (entrustment/dominion). By dishonestly selling the goods, “A” misappropriated the property, which is a violation of the trust and the contract. This scenario perfectly fits the definition of Criminal Breach of Trust under Section 405 of the IPC.
It is not Theft (C) because “A” had lawful possession of the property. It is not Dishonest Misappropriation of Property (A) under Section 403, as that section typically applies to property not in one’s initial lawful possession through entrustment. Dishonest Holding of Property (D) is not a specific offence defined as such in the IPC.

Join Our Telegram Channel

12. A person commits the offence of Criminal Breach of Trust if he 1. mi

A person commits the offence of Criminal Breach of Trust if he

Join Our Telegram Channel
  • 1. misappropriates the property he is entrusted with.
  • 2. misappropriates the property having any dominion over the same.
  • 3. misappropriates with dishonest intention.
  • 4. converts it to his own use.

Select the correct answer using the code given below :

Subscribe on YouTube
1 and 3 only
1, 2 and 3 only
2 and 4 only
1, 2, 3 and 4
This question was previously asked in
UPSC CISF-AC-EXE – 2021
Download PDFAttempt Online
The correct answer is D) 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Section 405 of the IPC defines Criminal Breach of Trust. The definition includes being entrusted with property or having dominion over property (points 1 and 2), and dishonestly misappropriating it or converting it to one’s own use (points 3 and 4). All four points represent essential aspects or actions that constitute the offence as described in the section.
Criminal breach of trust requires: (a) entrustment or dominion over property, and (b) dishonest misappropriation, conversion, or use/disposal in violation of law/contract, or wilfully suffering others to do so. Options 1, 2, 3, and 4 cover these elements comprehensively.

13. Criminal Breach of Trust is defined under

Criminal Breach of Trust is defined under

Join Our Telegram Channel
Section 405 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 403 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 415 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 410 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
This question was previously asked in
UPSC CISF-AC-EXE – 2021
Download PDFAttempt Online
The correct answer is A) Section 405 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Section 405 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, provides the definition of the offence of Criminal Breach of Trust.
Section 403 defines Dishonest Misappropriation of Property. Section 415 defines Cheating. Section 410 defines Stolen Property.

Subscribe on YouTube

14. “A” without taking permission from “Z” scales the wall of “Z”s house a

“A” without taking permission from “Z” scales the wall of “Z”s house at night and enters “Z”s house through a window. “A” has committed the offence of

Join Our Telegram Channel
Criminal Trespass.
House Breaking by Night.
Lurking House Trespass by Night.
House Trespass.
This question was previously asked in
UPSC CISF-AC-EXE – 2021
Download PDFAttempt Online
The correct answer is B) House Breaking by Night.
The act described involves entering a house (“Z”s house) in a manner that constitutes house-breaking (scaling a wall and entering through a window are specified methods in Section 445 – House Breaking). Since the act is committed “at night”, it constitutes House Breaking by Night, which is an aggravated form of house-breaking defined under Section 446 of the IPC.
Criminal Trespass (A) is the basic offence. House Trespass (D) is a specific type of criminal trespass involving a building. Lurking House Trespass by Night (C) involves taking precautions to conceal the trespass. While elements of these might be present, “House Breaking by Night” is the most specific and complete description of the offence based on the facts provided (scaling wall, entering via window, at night).

Subscribe on YouTube

15. Punishment for Mischief by fire or explosive substance with intent to

Punishment for Mischief by fire or explosive substance with intent to destroy house has been prescribed in which one of the following Sections of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ?

Join Our Telegram Channel
Section 436
Section 435
Section 437
Section 434
This question was previously asked in
UPSC CISF-AC-EXE – 2021
Download PDFAttempt Online
The correct answer is A) Section 436.
Section 436 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, specifically prescribes the punishment for committing mischief by fire or any explosive substance with intent to destroy, or knowing it to be likely that one will thereby cause the destruction of, any building which is ordinarily used as a human dwelling, or as a place for worship, or as a place for the custody of property.
Section 435 deals with mischief by fire or explosive substance causing damage above a certain value, but not necessarily directed at destroying a house. Sections 434 and 437 deal with other specific types of mischief.

Subscribe on YouTube

16. “A” causes cattle to enter upon a field belonging to “Z”, intending to

“A” causes cattle to enter upon a field belonging to “Z”, intending to cause and knowing that he is likely to cause damage to “Z”s crop. “A” has committed the offence of

Subscribe on YouTube
Theft.
Mischief.
Criminal Trespass.
Criminal Misappropriation.
This question was previously asked in
UPSC CISF-AC-EXE – 2021
Download PDFAttempt Online
The correct answer is B) Mischief.
Section 425 of the IPC defines Mischief. It involves causing destruction to property, or any such change in property or in the situation thereof as destroys or diminishes its value or utility, or affects it injuriously, with intent to cause, or knowing that one is likely to cause, wrongful loss or damage to the public or to any person. Causing cattle to enter and damage crops perfectly fits this definition.
Theft (A) involves taking movable property. Criminal Trespass (C) involves unauthorized entry onto property with specific intent. Criminal Misappropriation (D) involves dishonestly taking or converting property. None of these accurately describe the act of intentionally causing damage to property by letting cattle graze.

Join Our Telegram Channel

17. “A” finds a ring lying on the highway and keeps it with him. Which one

“A” finds a ring lying on the highway and keeps it with him. Which one of the following statements is correct ?

Subscribe on YouTube
"A" has committed the offence of theft.
It is not theft because the ring was not in possession of anyone.
It is theft because the intention of "A" was dishonest.
It is theft because the property is immovable and "A"s intention is dishonest.
This question was previously asked in
UPSC CISF-AC-EXE – 2021
Download PDFAttempt Online
The correct answer is B) It is not theft because the ring was not in possession of anyone.
The offence of theft under Section 378 of the IPC requires the movable property to be taken “out of the possession of any person”. When a ring is found lying on the highway, it is considered lost property and is generally not deemed to be in the immediate possession of any specific person.
While “A” may have a dishonest intention in keeping the ring without attempting to find the owner, finding lost property and dishonestly misappropriating it falls under the offence of Dishonest Misappropriation of Property (Section 403 IPC), not theft. Theft specifically requires taking from possession.

Join Our Telegram Channel

18. Under the Indian Penal Code, 1860, which one of the following statemen

Under the Indian Penal Code, 1860, which one of the following statements about “Theft” is correct ?

Join Our Telegram Channel
It is defined under Section 379 of the Code.
It applies to both movable and immovable property.
Delivery of property is essential.
Property should be in possession of someone.
This question was previously asked in
UPSC CISF-AC-EXE – 2021
Download PDFAttempt Online
The correct answer is D) Property should be in possession of someone.
Section 378 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, defines theft as taking movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent, with the intention of taking it dishonestly. The requirement that the property must be in the possession of someone is a fundamental element of theft.
Option A is incorrect because Section 379 deals with the punishment for theft, not its definition. Option B is incorrect because theft applies only to movable property (Section 378). Option C is incorrect; theft involves taking without consent, not receiving property through delivery (which implies consent).

Subscribe on YouTube

19. Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, a witness summoned by a Court of

Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, a witness summoned by a Court of Law to produce a document which is in his possession has to do which one of the following?

Join Our Telegram Channel
Shall bring it to the Court notwithstanding any objection
May refuse to bring it in the interest of national security
May refuse to bring it on the ground of confidentiality
Shall produce before the Court only if there is no objection
This question was previously asked in
UPSC CISF-AC-EXE – 2018
Download PDFAttempt Online
Section 162 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 governs the production of documents summoned by a Court.
Section 162 states: “A witness summoned to produce a document shall, if it is in his possession or power, bring it to Court, notwithstanding any objection which there may be to its production or to its admissibility. The validity of any such objection shall be decided by the Court.” This means the witness is obligated to bring the document regardless of any objection; the objection is for the Court to consider regarding its admissibility or inspection, not a ground for the witness to refuse production.
Options B and C are incorrect as a witness cannot refuse to bring the document based on national security or confidentiality; these are grounds for objection to admissibility or inspection which the Court will rule upon after the document is produced. Option D is contrary to the mandatory requirement of Section 162.

Subscribe on YouTube

20. The Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms led to the enactment of which one among

The Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms led to the enactment of which one among the following landmark Acts?

Subscribe on YouTube
The Indian Councils Act, 1909
The Government of India Act, 1919
The Government of India Act, 1935
The Indian Councils Act, 1892
This question was previously asked in
UPSC CBI DSP LDCE – 2023
Download PDFAttempt Online
The Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms, proposed in the Montagu-Chelmsford Report in 1918, led to the enactment of the Government of India Act, 1919. This Act is also known as the Montagu-Chelmsford Act. It introduced dyarchy in the provinces and bicameralism at the Centre.
The Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms were a significant step towards responsible government in India, although limited in scope. They introduced separate electorates for Sikhs, Indian Christians, Anglo-Indians, and Europeans, extending communal representation.
The Indian Councils Act, 1909 is known as the Morley-Minto Reforms. The Government of India Act, 1935 was a more comprehensive statute that introduced provincial autonomy and dyarchy at the Centre, and established a federal structure. The Indian Councils Act, 1892 increased the number of additional members in the central and provincial legislative councils and introduced the principle of representation.

Join Our Telegram Channel
Page 1Page 2Page 3Page 4Page 5