2017

171. Choose the odd one out.

Choose the odd one out.

[amp_mcq option1=”Scanner” option2=”Printer” option3=”Mouse” option4=”Keyboard” correct=”option2″]

This question was previously asked in
UPSC CISF-AC-EXE – 2017
Download PDFAttempt Online
The correct answer is B) Printer.
In the given list, Scanner, Mouse, and Keyboard are all input devices used to provide data or commands to a computer. A Printer, on the other hand, is an output device that produces hard copies of data processed by the computer.
Input devices translate information from the outside world into a form that the computer can understand. Output devices translate information from the computer into a form that humans can understand or use (like printing on paper, displaying on a screen, or sound). The printer is the only output device in the list, making it the odd one out.

172. Consider the following statements related to the use of armed forces t

Consider the following statements related to the use of armed forces to disperse unlawful assembly:

  • Armed forces can be used when it cannot be otherwise dispersed.
  • Armed forces can be used when it is necessary for the public security.
  • Whether armed forces be used or not can be decided by any Executive Magistrate.
  • Whether armed forces be used or not can be decided by the Executive Magistrate of the highest rank who is present.

Which of the statements given above are correct ?

[amp_mcq option1=”1, 2 and 4 only” option2=”1 and 3 only” option3=”2 and 4 only” option4=”1, 2 and 3 only” correct=”option1″]

This question was previously asked in
UPSC CISF-AC-EXE – 2017
Download PDFAttempt Online
The correct answer is A) 1, 2 and 4 only.
Section 130(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 deals with the use of armed forces to disperse an unlawful assembly. It states that if an unlawful assembly cannot be otherwise dispersed (Statement 1) and if it is necessary for the public security that it should be dispersed (Statement 2), the Executive Magistrate of the highest rank who is present may cause it to be dispersed by the armed forces (Statement 4).
Statement 3 is incorrect because the decision to use armed forces is specifically vested in the Executive Magistrate of the *highest rank* present, not any Executive Magistrate. This ensures that such a grave decision is taken by the most senior available executive authority on the spot. Sections 130 and 131 outline the procedure and limitations for the use of armed forces in dispersing assemblies, emphasizing that it should only be resorted to when civil force is insufficient and public security necessitates it.

173. As per Section 129 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, dispersal

As per Section 129 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, dispersal of unlawful assembly by civil force can be commanded by

[amp_mcq option1=”any Judicial Magistrate or Executive Magistrate” option2=”any Executive Magistrate or Officer In-charge of a police station or any police officer not below the rank of Sub-Inspector” option3=”District Magistrate or Superintendent of Police” option4=”any Magistrate or any police officer” correct=”option2″]

This question was previously asked in
UPSC CISF-AC-EXE – 2017
Download PDFAttempt Online
The correct answer is B) any Executive Magistrate or Officer In-charge of a police station or any police officer not below the rank of Sub-Inspector.
Section 129(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 explicitly states that any Executive Magistrate or officer in charge of a police station, or in the absence of such officer, any police officer not below the rank of a Sub-Inspector, may command an unlawful assembly to disperse using civil force.
This section empowers specific officials to take immediate action to disperse an unlawful assembly using the available civil force (police). The authority is granted to officials based on their executive or police rank, allowing for prompt response to maintain public order. Judicial Magistrates are not granted this power under Section 129, as their role is judicial, not executive or law enforcement in this context.

174. Which of the following acts cannot be authorised to be carried out by

Which of the following acts cannot be authorised to be carried out by any police officer above the rank of a Constable through a warrant by a District Magistrate, Sub-Divisional Magistrate or a Magistrate of the first class, who upon being informed, and after such inquiry as he thinks necessary, has reasons to believe that any place is used for deposit or sale of any objectionable article, or that any such objectionable article is deposited in any place?

[amp_mcq option1=”To enter such place with such assistance as may be required” option2=”To search the place in any manner as deemed fit by the officer authorised by the warrant to carry out the search” option3=”To convey such property or article before a Magistrate” option4=”To take possession of any property or article therein found which he reasonably suspects to be stolen property” correct=”option2″]

This question was previously asked in
UPSC CISF-AC-EXE – 2017
Download PDFAttempt Online
The correct answer is B) To search the place in any manner as deemed fit by the officer authorised by the warrant to carry out the search.
Section 94(1) of CrPC authorises a specified Magistrate to issue a warrant to a police officer (above Constable) to enter and search a place suspected of containing objectionable articles. The warrant can authorise the officer to enter, search, take possession of relevant articles (stolen property, counterfeit items, forged documents, etc.), convey them to a Magistrate, and secure the place. However, the Section does not grant the officer the power to search in “any manner as deemed fit”. Searches under CrPC must be conducted according to established legal procedures, such as those outlined in Section 100 regarding conducting searches in enclosed places, which include requirements like obtaining witnesses.
Authorising a search “in any manner as deemed fit” would violate the principles of due process and could lead to arbitrary and unreasonable searches. While the officer is given the authority to search the place, the *manner* of the search must conform to the law and established procedures designed to protect the rights of individuals, even during a search under a warrant.

175. Consider the following statements : Search warrant, under Section 93 o

Consider the following statements :
Search warrant, under Section 93 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, may be issued where

  • 1. the Court has reason to believe that the concerned person will not produce the document or thing as required.
  • 2. such document or thing is known to the Court to be in possession of any person.
  • 3. the Court considers that the purpose of any inquiry, trial or other proceeding under this Code will be served by a general search or inspection.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?

[amp_mcq option1=”1 and 2 only” option2=”3 only” option3=”1 and 3 only” option4=”1, 2 and 3″ correct=”option3″]

This question was previously asked in
UPSC CISF-AC-EXE – 2017
Download PDFAttempt Online
The correct answer is C) 1 and 3 only.
Section 93(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 lists the circumstances under which a search warrant may be issued. These include:
1. If the court has reason to believe that a person will not produce a document or thing required by a summons or requisition (Statement 1).
2. If such document or thing is not known to the court to be in the possession of any person (which contradicts Statement 2).
3. If the court considers that a general search or inspection is necessary for the purpose of any inquiry, trial, or other proceeding (Statement 3).
Statement 2 is incorrect because Section 93(1)(b) applies when the location of the document or thing is unknown or not known to be in the possession of any specific person, making a summons under Section 91 or 92 ineffective. The power to issue a search warrant is a significant one and is exercised when production through summons/requisition is unlikely or impossible, or when a general search is deemed necessary for the investigation/proceeding.

176. When a hijacked aircraft lands at an Indian airport, which among the f

When a hijacked aircraft lands at an Indian airport, which among the following will be responsible for laying the inner cordon ?

[amp_mcq option1=”The nearest Army Unit” option2=”CISF at the concerned airport” option3=”The District Police” option4=”CISF will lay the inner cordon and on arrival of NSG task force it (NSG) will assume the overall command” correct=”option4″]

This question was previously asked in
UPSC CISF-AC-EXE – 2017
Download PDFAttempt Online
The correct answer is D) CISF will lay the inner cordon and on arrival of NSG task force it (NSG) will assume the overall command.
In the initial phase of a hijack crisis at an Indian airport, the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), which is responsible for airport security, lays the inner cordon around the aircraft. When the National Security Guard (NSG) task force, the designated counter-terrorism intervention force, arrives, they take over the overall command of the operation, including the management of the inner cordon and the potential intervention.
The security response to an aircraft hijack is multi-layered and involves various agencies. CISF provides the initial security ring. State Police and potentially other forces may provide outer cordons and support. The NSG is the primary intervention force for situations like hijackings. The command structure shifts to the NSG commander upon their arrival.

177. In case of a hijack of an Aircraft registered in India landing at an I

In case of a hijack of an Aircraft registered in India landing at an Indian Airport, the executive responsibility for hands on crisis management rests with

[amp_mcq option1=”Central Committee chaired by DGCA” option2=”Committee of Secretaries (COSAH) headed by the Cabinet Secretary” option3=”Aerodrome Committee of the concerned airport headed by the Airport Director” option4=”Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) headed by the Prime Minister” correct=”option3″]

This question was previously asked in
UPSC CISF-AC-EXE – 2017
Download PDFAttempt Online
The correct answer is C) Aerodrome Committee of the concerned airport headed by the Airport Director.
According to India’s National Anti-Hijacking Contingency Plan (NAPCP), the Aerodrome Committee at the concerned airport is the primary body responsible for the hands-on, on-site crisis management during an aircraft hijack incident.
The Aerodrome Committee is headed by the Airport Director and includes representatives from relevant agencies like CISF, ATC, airlines, state police, etc. The Committee of Secretaries on Aircraft Hijack (COSAH) and the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) handle policy, strategic direction, and high-level approvals, while the Aerodrome Committee manages the tactical and operational response at the airport.

178. RDX stands for

RDX stands for

[amp_mcq option1=”Research Department Explosive” option2=”Radio Device Explosive” option3=”Radioactive Detonated Explosive” option4=”None of the above” correct=”option1″]

This question was previously asked in
UPSC CISF-AC-EXE – 2017
Download PDFAttempt Online
The correct answer is A) Research Department Explosive.
RDX is a powerful explosive widely used in military and industrial applications. The acronym originated from the British Research Department in the 1930s.
RDX is also known by other names such as cyclonite or hexogen. It is a key component in various explosive mixtures, including C-4 plastic explosive. While the name RDX is commonly cited as originating from “Research Department Explosive” in the UK, it is sometimes also said to stand for “Royal Demolition Explosive”. The UK origin is the most widely accepted for the acronym itself.

179. Who among the following is not exempted from Pre-embarkation Securit

Who among the following is not exempted from Pre-embarkation Security Check at Civilian Airports (as on 01.12.2015) ?

[amp_mcq option1=”Holders of Bharat Ratna decoration” option2=”His Holiness the Dalai Lama” option3=”Chiefs of Staff holding rank of full General or equivalent” option4=”Commissioner of Bureau of Civil Aviation Security” correct=”option4″]

This question was previously asked in
UPSC CISF-AC-EXE – 2017
Download PDFAttempt Online
As of the specified date (01.12.2015), the Commissioner of the Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (BCAS) was generally not included in the list of persons exempted from pre-embarkation security checks at civilian airports, unlike the other dignitaries listed.
Exemption from security checks is typically granted to very high constitutional functionaries, specific protectees (like SPG protectees), holders of high national honours, and certain security personnel *when on duty* and identified.
The list of exempted persons is periodically updated by the Ministry of Civil Aviation based on security protocols and official status. While Bharat Ratna awardees, His Holiness the Dalai Lama (due to his status and security needs), and Chiefs of Staff (ranking as full General or equivalent) were typically on the exempted list as of 2015, the Commissioner of BCAS, despite their crucial role in aviation security, was not usually on this specific personal exemption list for the physical security check.

180. A passenger travelling by Air wishes to carry his licenced Revolver. H

A passenger travelling by Air wishes to carry his licenced Revolver. He can carry it

[amp_mcq option1=”in his cabin baggage by intimating it to CISF.” option2=”in his hold baggage after declaring to Airlines at the time of check-in.” option3=”in his hold baggage after obtaining clearance from DGCA.” option4=”only after handing it over to the Captain of the aircraft and collecting it at the destination.” correct=”option2″]

This question was previously asked in
UPSC CISF-AC-EXE – 2017
Download PDFAttempt Online
A passenger with a licensed revolver can carry it in their hold baggage only after declaring it to the airline at the time of check-in.
Carrying firearms or ammunition in cabin baggage is strictly prohibited. Specific security procedures must be followed for transporting licensed firearms in checked baggage.
The firearm must be unloaded, properly packed in a secure case, and declared to the airline staff. There might be fees and specific documentation requirements depending on the airline and destination. Obtaining DGCA clearance for routine passenger travel with a licensed firearm is not the standard procedure; adhering to airline and security regulations at check-in is. Handing it to the Captain is incorrect.
Page 1Page 2Page 3Page 4Page 5