Suppose on performing reduced error pruning, we collapsed a node and observed an improvement in the prediction accuracy on the validation set. Which among the following statements are possible in light of the performance improvement observed? (a) The collapsed node helped overcome the effect of one or more noise affected data points in the training set (b) The validation set had one or more noise affected data points in the region corresponding to the collapsed node (c) The validation set did not have any data points along at least one of the collapsed branches (d) The validation set did have data points adversely affected by the collapsed node

a and b
a and d
b, c and d
all of the above

The correct answer is D. all of the above.

Reduced error pruning is a technique used in decision trees to improve the accuracy of the tree by removing branches that do not contribute significantly to the classification of the data. When a node is collapsed, the data points that were associated with that node are redistributed to the remaining nodes in the tree. This can result in a number of changes to the tree, including the removal of branches, the splitting of nodes, and the reclassification of data points.

The performance improvement observed after collapsing a node can be due to a number of factors. One possibility is that the collapsed node helped overcome the effect of one or more noise affected data points in the training set. These data points may have been misclassified by the tree, and collapsing the node removed them from the tree, resulting in an improvement in the accuracy of the tree.

Another possibility is that the validation set had one or more noise affected data points in the region corresponding to the collapsed node. These data points may have been misclassified by the tree, and collapsing the node removed them from the tree, resulting in an improvement in the accuracy of the tree on the validation set.

Finally, it is also possible that the validation set did not have any data points along at least one of the collapsed branches. In this case, collapsing the node did not affect the accuracy of the tree on the validation set, but it did simplify the tree, which may have made it easier to interpret.

In conclusion, the performance improvement observed after collapsing a node can be due to a number of factors, including the removal of noise affected data points, the simplification of the tree, or a combination of both.

Exit mobile version