The correct answer is: Only conclusion I follows.
The first statement is in the form of “All A are not B.” This is logically equivalent to the statement “No A is B.” The second statement is in the form of “All C are A.” This is logically equivalent to the statement “All C are not B.”
To form a conclusion, we can use the following rule of inference:
If all A are not B, and all C are A, then all C are not B.
In this case, the first statement is “All men are not donkeys.” The second statement is “Rahul is a man.” Therefore, the conclusion is “Rahul is not a donkey.”
Conclusion II, “All men are not Rahul,” does not
64 288 64S117.2 64 74.6 75.5c-23.5 6.3-42 24.9-48.3 48.6-11.4 42.9-11.4 132.3-11.4 132.3s0 89.4 11.4 132.3c6.3 23.7 24.8 41.5 48.3 47.8C117.2 448 288 448 288 448s170.8 0 213.4-11.5c23.5-6.3 42-24.2 48.3-47.8 11.4-42.9 11.4-132.3 11.4-132.3s0-89.4-11.4-132.3zm-317.5 213.5V175.2l142.7 81.2-142.7 81.2z"/> Subscribe on YouTube