The correct answer is: Only conclusion II follows.
The first statement is “All jungles are tigers.” This means that every jungle is a tiger. The second statement is “Some tigers are horses.” This means that there are some tigers that are also horses.
From these two statements, we can conclude that some horses are tigers. However, we cannot conclude that some horses are jungles. This is because the first statement only says that all jungles are tigers, not that all tigers are jungles. It is possible for there to be tigers that are not jungles.
Therefore, only conclusion II follows. Conclusion I does not follow.