Statements : All fish are tortoise. No tortoise is a crocodile. Conclusions : I. No crocodile is a fish. II. No fish is a crocodile.

Only conclusion I follows
Only conclusion II follows
Either I or II follows
Neither I nor II follows E. Both I and II follow

The correct answer is: Both I and II follow.

The first statement is “All fish are tortoise.” This means that every single fish is also a tortoise. The second statement is “No tortoise is a crocodile.” This means that no tortoise is a crocodile.

From the first statement, we know that all fish are tortoise. From the second statement, we know that no tortoise is a crocodile. Therefore, we can conclude that no fish is a crocodile. This is because if a fish were a crocodile, it would be a tortoise, but we know that no tortoise is a crocodile.

We can also conclude that no crocodile is a fish. This is because if a crocodile were a fish, it would be a tortoise, but we know that all fish are tortoises.

Therefore, both conclusions I and II follow.

Exit mobile version