Statement I : The city of Rome revived in a spectacular way in the 15t

Statement I : The city of Rome revived in a spectacular way in the 15th century.
Statement II : From the 15th century onwards, artists were known individually by name, not as member of a group or a guild, in Roman society.

Both the statements are individually true and Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I
Both the statements are individually true but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I
Statement I is true but Statement II is false
Statement I is false but Statement II is true
This question was previously asked in
UPSC NDA-2 – 2016
Statement I: The city of Rome revived in a spectacular way in the 15th century. (True)
Statement II: From the 15th century onwards, artists were known individually by name, not as member of a group or a guild, in Roman society. (True)
Both the statements are individually true but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I.
– Rome experienced a significant revival during the Renaissance period, particularly in the later 15th and 16th centuries, characterized by vast building programs, artistic patronage by the Papacy, and a flourishing of arts and letters.
– The Renaissance era marked a shift in the status of artists, who increasingly gained individual recognition for their work, moving away from the anonymity common in medieval guilds.
– Both statements are true historical facts related to the 15th century in Europe, particularly associated with the Renaissance.
– However, the change in the social status and recognition of artists (Statement II) was a *characteristic* of the Renaissance period and contributed to its cultural output, but it was not the *primary cause* or *explanation* for the overall spectacular revival of Rome as a city. The revival was driven by numerous factors including papal policy, economic factors, and a broader rediscovery of classical antiquity.
Exit mobile version