[amp_mcq option1=”PQRS” option2=”PSRQ” option3=”QPRS” option4=”SQPR” correct=”option1″]
The correct answer is: A. PQRS
The first sentence, “There were no finger prints anywhere,” is a fact that the investigators found when they arrived at the crime scene. The second sentence, “First of all it was impossible even for a child to enter through the hole in the roof,” is an explanation of why the investigators believe that the thief must have entered through another way. The third sentence, “When the investigators tried to reconstruct the crime, they came up against facts,” is a description of the investigators’ efforts to figure out how the crime was committed. The fourth sentence, “Moreover, when the detectives tried to push a silver vase, it was found to be double the sizeof the hole,” is a piece of evidence that supports the investigators’ theory that the thief must have entered through another way. The fifth sentence, “Again, the size of the hole was examined by the experts who said that nothing had been passed through it,” is another piece of evidence that supports the investigators’ theory. The sixth sentence, “These conclusions made the detectives think that it was a fake theft,” is the investigators’ conclusion based on the evidence they found.
The other options are incorrect because they do not follow the logical order of events. For example, option B, PSRQ, puts the investigators’ conclusion before the evidence they found. This is not logical because the investigators would not have been able to reach their conclusion without first finding the evidence. Option C, QPRS, puts the evidence before the investigators’ conclusion. This is also not logical because the investigators would not have been able to find the evidence without first having a theory about how the crime was committed. Option D, SQPR, puts the investigators’ efforts to reconstruct the crime before the evidence they found. This is also not logical because the investigators would not have been able to reconstruct the crime without first finding the evidence.