Mr. X, a tradesman, left certain goods at Mr. Y’s house by mistake, in this case, Mr. Y

is bound to return the goods under quasi-contratual obligations
is not bound to return the goods as there is no agreement between the two
can use the goods as his own and can also claim compensation from Mr. X
is under obligation to make a fresh contract with Mr. X for the use of these goods

The correct answer is: A. is bound to return the goods under quasi-contractual obligations.

A quasi-contract is a legal obligation that arises from the unjust enrichment of one party at the expense of another. In this case, Mr. X has been enriched by Mr. Y’s possession of the goods, and Mr. Y has been unjustly deprived of them. Therefore, Mr. Y is under a quasi-contractual obligation to return the goods to Mr. X.

Option B is incorrect because there is an agreement between the two parties, even if it is an informal one. Mr. X has entrusted the goods to Mr. Y, and Mr. Y has accepted them. This creates an obligation on Mr. Y to return the goods.

Option C is incorrect because Mr. Y does not have the right to use the goods as his own. They belong to Mr. X, and Mr. Y must return them.

Option D is incorrect because Mr. Y is not under an obligation to make a fresh contract with Mr. X. The quasi-contractual obligation to return the goods arises from the existing relationship between the parties, and does not require a new contract.

Exit mobile version