Mizo society traditionally had its own customs and practices for dispute resolution, often mediated by:

Village chiefs and elders
British colonial courts
Missionary-run tribunals
The Indian judiciary system

The correct answer is: a) Village chiefs and elders.

Mizo society traditionally had its own customs and practices for dispute resolution, often mediated by village chiefs and elders. These customs and practices were based on the Mizo people’s belief in a system of social order and harmony. Disputes were seen as disruptions to this order and harmony, and so they were resolved through a process of mediation and negotiation. Village chiefs and elders were respected members of the community who were seen as impartial and fair. They were therefore well-suited to the role of mediators in dispute resolution.

British colonial courts were established in Mizoram in the 19th century. These courts were based on the British legal system, which was very different from the Mizo system of dispute resolution. As a result, the British colonial courts were not always effective in resolving disputes between Mizo people.

Missionary-run tribunals were also established in Mizoram in the 19th century. These tribunals were based on Christian principles, and they were often used to resolve disputes between Christians and non-Christians. However, they were not always accepted by the Mizo people, who did not always agree with the Christian principles on which they were based.

The Indian judiciary system was established in Mizoram after India gained independence in 1947. The Indian judiciary system is based on the British legal system, and it is the highest court of law in India. However, the Indian judiciary system has not always been effective in resolving disputes between Mizo people. This is because the Indian judiciary system is based on a different set of cultural values and beliefs than the Mizo system of dispute resolution.

In conclusion, the correct answer is: a) Village chiefs and elders.

Exit mobile version