In order that a motion may be admissible, it shall satisfy which one o

In order that a motion may be admissible, it shall satisfy which one of the following conditions?

It shall not raise substantially one definite issue.
It shall not contain arguments, inferences, ironical expressions, imputations or defamatory statements.
It shall refer to the conduct or character of persons.
It shall not be restricted to a matter of recent occurrence.
This question was previously asked in
UPSC SO-Steno – 2018
A motion, in order to be admissible, shall not contain arguments, inferences, ironical expressions, imputations or defamatory statements. Parliamentary procedure requires motions to be concise, factual, and free from contentious or offensive language.
Rules governing the admissibility and form of motions (and notices) in Parliament aim to maintain decorum and focus debate. Standard parliamentary practice and rules (e.g., Rule 334 of Lok Sabha Rules) prohibit the inclusion of subjective elements like arguments, inferences, or personal attacks in the text of a motion.
Let’s examine the other options: A motion is generally required to raise substantially *one definite issue* (contrary to option A). Motions should typically *not* refer to the conduct or character of persons unless it is a substantive motion for a specific purpose like removal (contrary to option C). While motions can address historical issues, many important parliamentary devices like calling attention, adjournment motions, and short duration discussions are specifically intended for matters of *recent occurrence* or urgent public importance (contrary to option D). Thus, option B states a correct condition for the admissibility of a motion.