The correct answer is: B. be reimbursed for such supplies from the property of such incapable person.
This is because of the doctrine of necessaries, which states that a person who is incapable of entering into a contract (such as a minor or a person with mental disabilities) is still bound to pay for necessaries that have been supplied to them. Necessaries are goods or services that are necessary for the person’s basic needs, such as food, clothing, and shelter.
The doctrine of necessaries is based on the idea that it is unfair for a person to benefit from goods or services without paying for them. The person who supplies the necessaries is entitled to be reimbursed from the property of the incapable person, even if the incapable person did not agree to the contract.
Option A is incorrect because it is not always the case that a relative of the incapable person will be able to reimburse the person who supplied the necessaries. For example, if the incapable person has no relatives or if
their relatives are not able to afford to pay for the necessaries, then the person who supplied the necessaries may not be able to recover their costs.Option C is incorrect because it is not always the case that the incapable person has property from which the person who supplied the necessaries can be reimbursed. For example, if the incapable person is a minor, they may not have any property of their own.
Option D is incorrect because the doctrine of necessaries does entitle the person who supplied the necessaries to be reimbursed.