He could see . . . . . . . . boy on a bicycle delivering newspapers, and two dogs playing in the park opposite. A. a B. an C. the D. no article

[amp_mcq option1=”a” option2=”an” option3=”the” option4=”no article” correct=”option4″]

The correct answer is D. no article.

The sentence is about a general observation, not a specific one. It is not about a particular boy or dogs, but about boys and dogs in general. Therefore, we do not need to use an article.

If we were to use an article, it would change the meaning of the sentence. For example, if we used “a boy,” it would imply that there was only one boy. If we used “the boy,” it would imply that the speaker was referring to a specific boy that they knew.

In this case, the speaker is simply observing that there are boys and dogs in the park. They are not referring to any specific boy or dog. Therefore, we do not need to use an article.

Exit mobile version