Dividend changes are perceived important than the absolute level of dividends because.

management change dividends to protect their seats
dividend changes are thought to signal future expectations
MM state that absolute level of dividends is irrelevant
changes determine the level of borrowing

The correct answer is: B. dividend changes are thought to signal future expectations.

Dividend changes are perceived to be more important than the absolute level of dividends because they are thought to signal future expectations about the company’s financial performance. When a company increases its dividend, it is sending a signal to investors that it expects to continue to generate strong earnings and cash flow in the future. This can lead to an increase in the company’s stock price. Conversely, when a company decreases its dividend, it is sending a signal to investors that it expects its earnings and cash flow to decline in the future. This can lead to a decrease in the company’s stock price.

The other options are incorrect for the following reasons:

  • Option A is incorrect because management does not change dividends to protect their seats. In fact, management is more likely to increase dividends when they are confident in the company’s future prospects.
  • Option C is incorrect because MM state that the absolute level of dividends is irrelevant. They argue that the only thing that matters is the total return to shareholders, which can be achieved through a combination of dividends and capital appreciation.
  • Option D is incorrect because dividend changes do not determine the level of borrowing. The level of borrowing is determined by the company’s financial needs and its ability to service its debt.
Exit mobile version