Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should there be only one university throughout India? Arguments : I. Yes. This is the only way to bring about uniformity in the educational standards. II. No. This is administratively impossible. III. Yes. This will make the degrees procured by students, comparable for offering jobs.

The correct answer is: Only I and III are strong.

Argument I is strong because it provides a clear and specific reason why there should be only one university throughout India: to bring about uniformity in the educational standards. This is a valid reason because uniformity in educational standards would ensure that all students receive a high-quality education, regardless of where they attend university.

Argument II is weak because it does not provide a clear and specific reason why there should not be only one university throughout India. The statement that “this is administratively impossible” is too vague to be considered a strong argument. It is not clear what specific administrative challenges would make it impossible to have only one university in India.

Argument III is strong because it provides a clear and specific reason why there should be only one university throughout India: to make the degrees procured by students, comparable for offering jobs. This is a valid reason because comparability of degrees would make it easier for students to find jobs after they graduate.

In conclusion, only arguments I and III are strong.