Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should the government ban all forms of protests including strikes and processions? Arguments : I. Yes. This is the only way to teach discipline to the employees. II. No. Government cannot deprive its citizens of their basic rights. III. Yes. This is the only way to ensure maximum productivity without disruption of work.

The correct answer is: None is strong.

Argument I is not strong because it does not provide any evidence to support the claim that banning all forms of protests is the only way to teach discipline to employees. It is possible to teach discipline without resorting to such extreme measures.

Argument II is strong because it provides a strong reason why the government should not ban all forms of protests. The right to protest is a fundamental human right, and the government should not deprive its citizens of this right.

Argument III is not strong because it does not provide any evidence to support the claim that banning all forms of protests is the only way to ensure maximum productivity without disruption of work. It is possible to ensure maximum productivity without resorting to such extreme measures.

In conclusion, none of the arguments are strong.