Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by four arguments I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should the rule of wearing helmet for both driver and pillion rider while driving a motor bike be enforced strictly? Arguments : I. Yes. It is a rule and rules should be followed strictly by all. II. No. Each individual knows how to protect his own life and it should be left to his discretion. III. No. It does not ensure safety as only the head is protected and rest of the body is not. IV. Yes. It is a necessity as head, being the most sensitive organ, is protected by the helmet.

None is strong
Only I and III are strong
Only I and IV are strong
Only II and IV are strong E. All are strong

The correct answer is: Only I and IV are strong.

Argument I is strong because it is based on the principle of authority. The rule of wearing a helmet while driving a motorcycle is a law, and laws should be followed by all. Argument IV is strong because it is based on the principle of utility. Wearing a helmet protects the head, which is the most important organ in the body. Arguments II and III are weak because they are based on the principle of autonomy. People should be free to make their own decisions about how to protect their own safety.

Here is a more detailed explanation of each argument:

Argument I: Yes. It is a rule and rules should be followed strictly by all.

This argument is based on the principle of authority. The rule of wearing a helmet while driving a motorcycle is a law, and laws should be followed by all. This argument is strong because it is based on a well-established principle. Laws are in place for a reason, and they should be followed by everyone.

Argument II: No. Each individual knows how to protect his own life and it should be left to his discretion.

This argument is based on the principle of autonomy. People should be free to make their own decisions about how to protect their own safety. This argument is weak because it does not take into account the fact that people are not always rational and may make decisions that are not in their own best interests. For example, people may not wear a helmet because they think it is uncomfortable or they do not think they will get into an accident. However, even if they are right and they do not get into an accident, they are still putting themselves at risk.

Argument III: No. It does not ensure safety as only the head is protected and rest of the body is not.

This argument is weak because it does not take into account the fact that the head is the most important organ in the body. If the head is injured, it can lead to serious health problems or even death. Wearing a helmet can help to protect the head in the event of an accident.

Argument IV: Yes. It is a necessity as head, being the most sensitive organ, is protected by the helmet.

This argument is strong because it is based on the principle of utility. Wearing a helmet protects the head, which is the most important organ in the body. This argument is strong because it is based on a well-established principle. The head is the most important organ in the body, and it is important to protect it in the event of an accident.

Exit mobile version