The correct answer is: Only argument I is strong.
Argument I is strong because it is based on the fact that many other powerful countries do not support the same international policies as the United States. This suggests that there is no need for India to support all of the United States’ international policies, as other countries have been able to achieve success without doing so.
Argument II is weak because it is based on the assumption that the only way for India to gain access to USA developmental funds is to support all of the United States’ international policies. This assumption is not necessarily true, as there may be other ways for India to gain access to these funds. Additionally, even if this assumption were true, it would not necessarily mean that India should support all of the United States’ international policies. India should only support those policies that it believes are in its best interests.
In conclusion, only argument I is strong. Argument II is weak because it is based on an assumption that is not necessarily true.