Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should there be more than one High Court in each state in India? Arguments : I. No. This will be a sheer wastage of taxpayers’ money. II. Yes. This will help reduce the backlog of cases pending for a very long time.

The correct answer is: Only argument II is strong.

Argument I is weak because it does not provide any evidence to support its claim that having more than one High Court in each state would be a waste of taxpayers’ money. It is possible that having more High Courts would actually save money in the long run, by reducing the backlog of cases and the time it takes to resolve them.

Argument II is strong because it provides evidence to support its claim that having more than one High Court in each state would help reduce the backlog of cases. The backlog of cases is a serious problem in India, and it is likely that having more High Courts would help to reduce it.

Therefore, only argument II is strong.