Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should there be a restriction on the migration of people from one state to another state in India? Arguments : I. No. Any Indian citizen has a basic right to stay at any place of his/her choice and hence they cannot be stopped. II. Yes. This is the way to effect an equitable distribution of resources across the states in India.

The correct answer is: D. Neither I nor II is strong

Argument I is not strong because it does not take into account the potential negative consequences of unrestricted migration. For example, unrestricted migration could lead to overcrowding in some areas, strain on resources, and social unrest.

Argument II is not strong because it does not provide any evidence to support the claim that restricting migration would lead to an equitable distribution of resources. In fact, there is no guarantee that this would be the case.

In conclusion, neither argument is strong enough to support the conclusion that there should be a restriction on the migration of people from one state to another state in India.