Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should government stop spending huge amounts of money on international sports? Arguments : I. Yes. This money can be utilized for upliftment of the poor. II. No. Sports persons will be frustrated and will not get international exposure.

The correct answer is: A. Only argument I is strong

Argument I is strong because it provides a clear and convincing reason why the government should stop spending huge amounts of money on international sports. The argument states that this money could be better used to uplift the poor, which is a noble goal that would benefit many people.

Argument II is weak because it does not provide a strong reason why the government should continue spending huge amounts of money on international sports. The argument states that sports persons will be frustrated and will not get international exposure if the government stops spending money on international sports. However, this is not a strong reason to continue spending money on international sports, as there are other ways for sports persons to get international exposure.

In conclusion, only argument I is strong.